Charges of capacitors in series and in parallel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on understanding the behavior of charges in capacitors when arranged in series versus parallel configurations. Participants explore the underlying principles of charge conservation and the implications for total charge in each arrangement, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why the charges of capacitors in series are the same and why the total charge equals the individual charges.
  • Another participant suggests that the sum of the charges on the connected plates of capacitors must be zero, assuming no additional charge is provided.
  • A different participant questions whether the potential could be brought to zero by equating the sum of the charge-to-capacitance ratios to the battery voltage.
  • One response emphasizes that charge conservation dictates that the total charge moving through capacitors in series is equal, while in parallel, the total charge is the sum of the individual charges.
  • Another participant describes an "H" shaped conductor between capacitors, arguing that it remains neutral and thus the charges on the capacitors must be equal in magnitude due to charge conservation.
  • One participant notes that the charge on a capacitor is defined by the integral of current over time, asserting that the current is the same for all capacitors in series, leading to equal charge on each.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the clarification and indicates understanding of the concepts discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple viewpoints and explanations regarding the behavior of charges in capacitors, indicating that there is no consensus on certain aspects, particularly around the implications of charge conservation and the potential differences in configurations.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the initial charge states of the capacitors and the role of the connecting wires, which may not be fully explored or agreed upon.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Schermata 2020-10-28 alle 15.56.17.png
Very simply, I can't understand why the charges of capacitors placed in series are all the same, and why even the total one(of the circuit) is equal to those.
How is it possible that the total charge is the same as the individual ones?
There must be some concept/property about capacitors which I'm not getting.
On the other hand, for parallel capacitors, the total charge is the sum of those of the single capacitors, and that's what I would assume generally and logically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the wire connecting the two capacitors. Assuming it was not given some additional charge, the sum of the charges on the two connected plates must be zero.
 
Doc Al said:
Consider the wire connecting the two capacitors. Assuming it was not given some additional charge, the sum of the charges on the two connected plates must be zero.
Why? Couldn't they just bring the potential to zero by having the sum of ##\frac{q}{C}## ratios equal to the battery voltage??
 
greg_rack said:
Why?
Because charge is conserved. They start with zero charge and that just gets distributed between the connected plates.

greg_rack said:
Couldn't they just bring the potential to zero by having the sum of ##\frac{q}{C}## ratios equal to the battery voltage??
Not sure what you are saying here. The battery voltage equals the sum of the voltages across each capacitor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, etotheipi, vanhees71 and 1 other person
You should consider the total charge that moves to charge the capacitors.
In the series case the total charge that moves is ##Q=Q_1=Q_2## because first it moves through one capacitor and then the same(because they are in series) charge it moves through the second capacitor.
In the parallel case ##Q_1## charge moves through one branch and ##Q_2## charge moves through the other branch so the total charge that moves is ##Q=Q_1+Q_2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi, vanhees71, phinds and 1 other person
Another way of saying the same thing is this. Consider the "H" shaped conducting piece between the two capacitors. It is initially neutral and, because it is isolated from the battery, it remains neutral when the battery is hooked up. Thus the total negative charge on the left side of the H must be equal in magnitude to total positive charge on the right side. Since, by definition, the charge ##Q## on a capacitor is the absolute value on either one of its plates, the two capacitors must have the same charge. Note that no mention was made of the capacitance of each capacitor, therefore this result is true regardless of the capacitances; it's a result of charge conservation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi, vanhees71, phinds and 1 other person
Yet another way of saying the same thing is to remember that the charge on a capacitor is given by ##q(t) = \int i(t) \ dt##. Since the capacitors are in series ##i(t)## is the same for all of them so ##q(t)## is also the same for all of them.

Simply put, charge conservation and the fact that charge does not cross the capacitor lead to this result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi, vanhees71, greg_rack and 1 other person
Thanks guys, I got it!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman, etotheipi, vanhees71 and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
152
Views
8K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K