Charging an object by friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the charge that can be accumulated on a 1 cm thermocol sphere through the triboelectric effect. The primary factors influencing the charge are the sphere's self-capacitance and the breakdown voltage of air, rather than the material itself. Calculations suggest that the sphere can hold approximately 1.1 microcoulombs of charge when rubbed, assuming ideal conditions. Surface roughness can significantly reduce this maximum charge due to decreased effective radius. Ultimately, the capacitance, determined by the object's size and shape, is crucial for understanding its charge storage capacity.
avjt
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi All.

I'm trying to get a quantitative sense of how much charge we can put on an object by rubbing: the 'triboelectric effect'.

To put it specifically, suppose I have a sphere of diameter 1 cm, made of thermocol (polystyrene). How much charge, approximately, can I reasonably expect to put on it by rubbing it with, say, some fur?

I'm looking for just an 'order of magnitude' -- like, is 1 microcoulomb reasonable? How about 10 uC? Or 100 uC? Or will it be lower -- like 100 nC or 10 nC...?

Thanks for the help...

Avijit
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Odd as it may seem but your answer is not about the material your sphere is made of but its 'self capacitance' and the breakdown voltage of the surrounding air.

Since you mention coulombs I will do this in SI units.

Your sphere will carry its charge largely on the surface like a conductor even though it is an insulator. The capacitance of a conducting sphere is given by

C = 4 * Pi * epsilon * R where Pi =3.14 etc, epsilon is the permittivity of
space = 8.854.. * 10^-12 Farads / metre and R is the radius of the sphere in metres.

In practice you can charge the sphere to the breakdown voltage of air by repeated rubbing (think of a Van De Graaf generator). The breakdown voltage of air is 30 Kvolt per inch of radius of the smallest curvature of the discharging electrode as a rule of thumb
so V=3* 10^4 * R / (2.54 * 10^-2) if the radius of your sphere is in metres.

Lastly the charge in coulombs Q on a capacitance C charged to a voltage V is given by

C= Q/V so Q=C * V

Putting this all together you get

Q= (4 * Pi * epsilon * 3 *10^4)* R^2/(2.54 ^-2)

Putting in the numbers we get Q = 1.1 * 10^-4 * R^2

so for your 1 cm sphere we get Q= 1.1 * 10^-6 Coulombs ie 1.1 micro Coulombs

Note that this is the maximum as any surface roughness will greatly decrease this (the bumps have smaller radius of curvature to R in the above equation is reduced so greatly decreasing the charge.
 
Thanks sambristol. Interesting to know that the charge will be independent of the material the ball is made of.

Cheers,

Avijit
 
the charge a material can store depends upon the capacitance of that material ... that is how charge it can store before it starts leaking it out (in simpler terms) . u can keep on charging that object until it starts leaking the charges ...
the capacitance is all that matters and it only depends on the size and the shape of your object ...hope it helps ... :)

vishal
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top