Check my Integration Homework: 1/x dx = (1/3)ln(ln(x)) + c

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qube
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integration problem discussed involves the integral of 1/x, which is correctly solved as ln(x). However, the book's solution presents an alternative form: (1/3)ln(ln(x)) + c. Both solutions are valid, as they yield the same derivative when differentiated. The key insight is recognizing that ln(x^3) can be expressed as 3ln(x), simplifying the comparison between the two solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic integration techniques
  • Familiarity with logarithmic properties, specifically ln(x^n)
  • Knowledge of differentiation and its relationship to integration
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving logarithms
NEXT STEPS
  • Review properties of logarithms, focusing on ln(x^n)
  • Practice differentiation of logarithmic functions
  • Explore alternative integration techniques for rational functions
  • Study the concept of additive constants in indefinite integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on integration techniques and logarithmic functions, as well as educators looking for examples of alternative solutions in integration problems.

Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://i.minus.com/j5qAhbyrxc1jX.jpg

Homework Equations



∫1/x dx = ln(x)

The Attempt at a Solution



Can you guys check my work? I got the solution above and I've been pounding my head against the wall for the last two hours as to why that solution, according to my book, is incorrect.

The solution, according to the book, is

(1/3)ln(ln(x)) + c
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you use that ln(x^3)=3*ln(x) you can show that your answer is the same as the books, with an extra additive constant.
 
Both answers are correct. If you differentiate both answers, you wind up with the integrand.


Tip: Your work would have been simpler if you had written ln(x3) as 3ln(x).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K