- #1

- 40

- 0

**figured it out, thanks**

Figured it out, thanks.

Last edited:

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- #1

- 40

- 0

Figured it out, thanks.

Last edited:

- #2

- 360

- 1

I believe I have solved the problem, I just want to make sure of its correctness.

I was to solve a spring differential equation that involved a damping force and to create a equation of motion. I did. Now, I need to figure out whether the weight ever passes through its equilibrium. The equation I ended up with is

x = e^(-8t) * (.5 - 2t) where x is displacement and t is time.

Now, to check whether weight passes through the equilibrium, what I did was set up the limit as x approaches infinity of (.5 - 2t)/(e^8t). Then, I used l'hopital's rule to find the limit as x approaches infinity of (-2)/(8e^8t). This comes out to be that the limit is 0, and therefore, the spring never passes through the equilibrium and there is no t-value.

Is my logic sound and my math correct?

I think you wrote the wrong thing. Don't you want to take the limit as t goes to infinity?

- #3

- 9,568

- 774

I believe I have solved the problem, I just want to make sure of its correctness.

I was to solve a spring differential equation that involved a damping force and to create a equation of motion. I did. Now, I need to figure out whether the weight ever passes through its equilibrium. The equation I ended up with is

x = e^(-8t) * (.5 - 2t) where x is displacement and t is time.

Now, to check whether weight passes through the equilibrium, what I did was set up the limit as t approaches infinity of (.5 - 2t)/(e^8t). Then, I used l'hopital's rule to find the limit as t approaches infinity of (-2)/(8e^8t). This comes out to be that the limit is 0, and therefore, the spring never passes through the equilibrium and there is no t-value.

Is my logic sound and my math correct?

No, your logic isn't sound, assuming your solution for x is correct. Presuming the equilibrium position is x = 0 the question is asking whether that happens for t > 0.

- #4

- 9,568

- 774

Right, and as t goes to infinity, it seems x gets closer and closer to x=0, but will never hit zero, is that correct or am I still lost?

It isn't asking you about the limit as t goes to infinity. It is asking whether there are any finite values of t where x hits the equilibrium position.

- #5

- 9,568

- 774

- #6

- 9,568

- 774

Share:

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 755

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 776

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 418

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 618

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 157

- Replies
- 58

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 517

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 658

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 576

- Replies
- 20

- Views
- 876