Chemical Potential: Heat Energy Carried by Particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between chemical potential and heat energy carried by particles, specifically examining the equations μ=∂G/∂N and μ=-T(∂S/∂N). The interpretation suggests that chemical potential can be viewed as the heat energy associated with a constituent particle in a system. The conversation also explores the variables influencing entropy (S) beyond particle number (N), emphasizing the importance of volume (V) and internal energy (U). A question arises regarding the negative sign in the equation Q=-TdS, which is clarified by noting that different sign conventions exist in thermodynamics. Overall, the discussion highlights the intricate connections between chemical potential, heat energy, and entropy in thermodynamic systems.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
in class, we just learned that the chemical potential was μ=∂G/∂N

i'm looking in my book and it says that μ=-T(∂S/∂N) this looks a lot like the partial of heat energy with respect to N. is my interpretation correct?

(assuming my interpretation was correct): so qualitatively, the chemical potential is the heat energy carried by a constituent particle of a system?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When taking the partial derivative, S is a function of what besides N?
Clearly you can write
##dS(V,U,N)=1/T dU+p/T dV + \mu/T dN ##, so ##\mu=T (\partial S/\partial N)_{V, U}##
 
okay silly question: where does the minus come from? Q=-TdS, but that minus gets canceled when rearranging to solve for dS like you did so then you end up with positive like you did.
 
There may be different sign convention. The most common one which I also use is Q=TdS.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top