Chemistry lab - limiting reagent - Can someone verify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Ker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Lab
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of using 5.00 mL of 1.00 M H2SO4 instead of 7 M H2SO4 on the yield of copper in a chemical reaction involving CuO and H2SO4. Participants concluded that CuO is the limiting reagent in both scenarios, resulting in the same yield of CuSO4, which is 0.004 moles. The discussion also highlighted that while the concentration of H2SO4 does not affect the yield, it may influence the reaction rate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stoichiometry in chemical reactions
  • Familiarity with limiting reagents in chemistry
  • Knowledge of molarity and its calculations
  • Basic principles of acid-base reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of limiting reagents in more detail
  • Learn about reaction kinetics and how concentration affects reaction rates
  • Explore the calculations involved in stoichiometric conversions
  • Investigate the role of different acids in chemical reactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone involved in laboratory work or chemical engineering who seeks to understand the principles of limiting reagents and reaction dynamics.

John Ker
Messages
16
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Suppose that, for reaction 4, you could not find the bottle of 7 M H2SO4 so you added 5.00 mL of the 1.00 M H2SO4 instead. How would this impact your final yield of Copper. (Show with calculations how this would impact the limiting reagent.)

Homework Equations


CuO(s) + H2SO4(aq) --> CuSO4(aq) + H2O(l)

The Attempt at a Solution


This was the series of transtions done to the copper.
Cu(NO3)2(aq) + 2NaOH(aq) --> Cu(OH)2(s) + 2 NaNO3(aq)

Cu(OH)2(s) + heat --> CuO(s) + H2O(l)

CuO(s) + H2SO4(aq) --> CuSO4(aq) + H2O(l)

CuSO4(aq) + Zn(s)--> ZnSO4(aq) + Cu(s)


I initially started with 10.00ml of .4M Cu(NO3)2. Hence .004 moles. The ratio for each copper reactant to the desired copper product is 1:1. Hence we will end up with .004 CuSO4. Now, in the case of using 7M H2SO4, the CuSO4 is the limiting reagent. However, we use 1M * .005ml = .005mol, doesn't this also keep CuSO4 as the limiting reagent, having no effect on the final yield of copper?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
John Ker said:
I initially started with 10.00ml of .4M Cu(NO3)2. Hence .004 moles. The ratio for each copper reactant to the desired copper product is 1:1. Hence we will end up with .004 CuSO4.

We end with Cu, not CuSO4, but yes, 1:1 and 0.004 moles is a constant throughout the process (assuming other reagents are in excess).

Now, in the case of using 7M H2SO4, the CuSO4 is the limiting reagent.

No, it is not, limiting reagent is either CuO or H2SO4. Product is never a limiting reagent.

Somehow your final conclusion (no effect of the final yield) is a correct one.
 
Borek said:
We end with Cu, not CuSO4, but yes, 1:1 and 0.004 moles is a constant throughout the process (assuming other reagents are in excess).
No, it is not, limiting reagent is either CuO or H2SO4. Product is never a limiting reagent.

Somehow your final conclusion (no effect of the final yield) is a correct one.

Hello, thanks for the response.

So after taking a relook youre right, I overlooked the product being the limiting reagent. In that case, wouldn't CuO be the limiting reagent, since it is only .004moles.
CuO is .004
7M H2SO4 is .035M
1M H2SO4 is .005M

In both cases, even with a reduction in the molarity of H2SO4, CuO is still the limiting reagent, hence the same amount of CuSO4 is produced?
 
John Ker said:
In both cases, even with a reduction in the molarity of H2SO4, CuO is still the limiting reagent, hence the same amount of CuSO4 is produced?

In general - yes.

Although high concentration of the acid will definitely speed up the reaction, so while theoretically everything is perfectly OK, process can be difficult to do in practice.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
22K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
25K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
51K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K