Choosing the Right Graduate Program for Your NSF Fellowship Application

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhazelm
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When applying for the NSF graduate fellowship, it's important to choose a prospective graduate program that aligns with your research interests and potential mentors, rather than solely focusing on the likelihood of acceptance. Reviewers are more concerned with the quality and feasibility of your project proposal than your chances of admission to a specific school. Listing a dream school is acceptable if your project is compelling and relevant to the faculty there. The acceptance rate for the fellowship is around 20-30%, and there may be quotas for certain demographics and regions. Ultimately, the emphasis should be on presenting a strong, novel research plan that showcases your interests and capabilities.
mhazelm
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I am applying for an NSF graduate fellowship this year. The application requires me to list my prospective graduate program, and describe my project at the school.

What I'm wondering is, what kind of school to list. I have three lists of potential schools - my dream list (the slightly out of my league, but if GRE goes well I could get in), my realistic list (I'm fairly certain I could get in) and my failsafe list (I for sure could get in even if I did badly on the GRE). I don't know whether to shoot for the stars on my NSF application and put my dream school up, or whether I should list something more realistic. I don't want to put down a good school if the reviewers might think "oh, she could never get in there, so we aren't going to award her"... but maybe that's not how the reviewers think at all..

I am just wondering if anyone has any suggestions, advice or comments about this.

Thanks! :cool:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm bumping this because this will probably turn into the NSF thread. I think it would be useless to try and predict where you're going to grad school right now. I hear the fellowship is very hard to get even if you're already in grad school and have a potential advisor, but then again I have a hard time judging what various people mean by hard. The point of an NSF fellowship is so YOU get the opportunity to pursue YOUR interests independent of a person you rely on for funding. With that stipend you can contract out all sorts of work.

As an aside, I'm considering applying this year, but I'm put off a bit by how much detail they want in the research plan when my area of interest is still pretty large (semiconductor device physics, specifically fabrication, but even that's a huge area).
 
List the schools where you are applying. Your project proposal should be novel/creative, though still feasible. Certainly, there should be some match between potential mentors for such a project and the schools where you are applying, otherwise it won't look very realistic. Otherwise, I'd think reviewers wouldn't worry about your chances of acceptance beyond whether your academic background weakens your application independently of that. Afterall, if you don't get accepted to the programs where you're applying, you're not going to get the money, so that aspect of it isn't really a big concern to them.
 
Do you know if NSF has quotas like granting a minimum number of GRFPs to every university? Also, what is the acceptance rate of the GRFP?
 
Odd to bump this very old thread. The funding rate of the GRFP is something around 20-30%, I believe, but this could be different this year as I believe stimulus money has been added. NSF seems to have quotas for certain groups such as women, as well as giving preference to certain parts of the country (I believe there is a question that asks you to say where you went to high school).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top