Chronology of recessional velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter yogi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a reference for plotting cosmological recessional velocity from the decoupling era to the present. A suggested tool is the Lightcone calculator, which can generate tables or curves based on specified distances. Users can customize the output to show growth speeds and visualize the velocity profile over time. The conversation highlights how the speed varies with distance and the importance of including future data to observe acceleration trends. Overall, the Lightcone calculator is recommended for anyone interested in analyzing the recessional velocity profile.
yogi
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
10
Does anyone have a reference to a site plotting the cosmological recessional velocity over the time span from the decoupling era to the present (i.e, the recessional velocity profile).

Thanks,

Yogi
 
Space news on Phys.org
yogi said:
Does anyone have a reference to a site plotting the cosmological recessional velocity over the time span from the decoupling era to the present (i.e, the recessional velocity profile).

Thanks,

Yogi

Sure, the Lightcone calculator can give you either a table or a curve plotted. Bear in mind that in order to have a well defined speed you have to specify some particular distance. The speed will depend on the distance chosen.

Click on the Lightcone link (e.g. in my signature) and when it comes up change Slower to one---that means the table will end with the present. then press calculate.

It is already set, as default value, to start at decoupling (recombination) Supper=1090.

Then to add a column that shows the growth speed of a particular distance, one which has size 14.4 Gly as of today, open the column selection menu and check the box for a'R0, then press calculate again.

If you want it to make a plot of that speed over time, just ask, its easy.
 
Yogi, I did what I suggested you do, but also Unchecked a number of columns to make the table cleaner, not so crowded with other information. This shows the growth speed history of one particular distance, one which today is 14.4 Gly and growing at exactly 1.00 c. But back at recombination time it was smaller by factor 1090 and growing at about 21 c.
So at that time its size was 14.4/1090 Gly.

You will only see the beginnings of exponential growth. If you want to see pronounced acceleration and more recognizable near-exponential growth, then you should include some future in the table. But you asked for recombination up to the present so that is what I've tabulated here.
{\scriptsize\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline R_{0} (Gly) & R_{\infty} (Gly) & S_{eq} & H_{0} & \Omega_\Lambda & \Omega_m\\ \hline 14.4&17.3&3400&67.9&0.693&0.307\\ \hline \end{array}} {\scriptsize\begin{array}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline a=1/S&S&T (Gy)&a'R_{0} (c) \\ \hline 0.001&1090.000&0.0004&21.023\\ \hline 0.001&863.334&0.0006&18.232\\ \hline 0.001&683.804&0.0008&15.881\\ \hline 0.002&541.606&0.0012&13.885\\ \hline 0.002&428.979&0.0017&12.180\\ \hline 0.003&339.773&0.0025&10.712\\ \hline 0.004&269.117&0.0036&9.443\\ \hline 0.005&213.154&0.0052&8.340\\ \hline 0.006&168.829&0.0075&7.377\\ \hline 0.007&133.721&0.0107&6.533\\ \hline 0.009&105.913&0.0153&5.791\\ \hline 0.012&83.889&0.0219&5.138\\ \hline 0.015&66.444&0.0312&4.561\\ \hline 0.019&52.627&0.0445&4.051\\ \hline 0.024&41.683&0.0634&3.600\\ \hline 0.030&33.015&0.0902&3.200\\ \hline 0.038&26.150&0.1282&2.845\\ \hline 0.048&20.712&0.1823&2.530\\ \hline 0.061&16.405&0.2590&2.250\\ \hline 0.077&12.993&0.3679&2.002\\ \hline 0.097&10.291&0.5223&1.782\\ \hline 0.123&8.151&0.7414&1.587\\ \hline 0.155&6.456&1.0518&1.415\\ \hline 0.196&5.114&1.4908&1.265\\ \hline 0.247&4.050&2.1099&1.135\\ \hline 0.312&3.208&2.9777&1.026\\ \hline 0.394&2.541&4.1804&0.942\\ \hline 0.497&2.013&5.8131&0.888\\ \hline 0.627&1.594&7.9554&0.873\\ \hline 0.792&1.263&10.6323&0.907\\ \hline 1.000&1.000&13.7872&1.000\\ \hline \end{array}}
 
Last edited:
I wanted a plot including some future, so I could show real acceleration, so I changed the S range to be from 10 to 0.1, not so far back into the past. This goes from year 545 million out to around 52 billion.
attachment.php?attachmentid=71066&stc=1&d=1404451216.png

You can see acceleration kicks in sometime between year 7 billion and year 8 billion. Here are the numbers:
{\scriptsize\begin{array}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline a=1/S&S&T (Gy)&a'R_{0} (c) \\ \hline 0.100&10.000&0.545&1.757\\ \hline 0.117&8.577&0.687&1.628\\ \hline 0.136&7.356&0.865&1.509\\ \hline 0.158&6.310&1.089&1.399\\ \hline 0.185&5.412&1.370&1.299\\ \hline 0.215&4.642&1.723&1.208\\ \hline 0.251&3.981&2.165&1.126\\ \hline 0.293&3.415&2.716&1.053\\ \hline 0.341&2.929&3.403&0.990\\ \hline 0.398&2.512&4.250&0.939\\ \hline 0.464&2.154&5.286&0.901\\ \hline 0.541&1.848&6.536&0.878\\ \hline 0.631&1.585&8.015&0.873\\ \hline 0.736&1.359&9.728&0.890\\ \hline 0.858&1.166&11.661&0.932\\ \hline 1.000&1.000&13.787&1.000\\ \hline 1.166&0.858&16.069&1.098\\ \hline 1.346&0.743&18.307&1.218\\ \hline 1.553&0.644&20.621&1.367\\ \hline 1.792&0.558&22.988&1.548\\ \hline 2.068&0.484&25.392&1.764\\ \hline 2.387&0.419&27.822&2.019\\ \hline 2.754&0.363&30.269&2.317\\ \hline 3.179&0.315&32.726&2.664\\ \hline 3.668&0.273&35.191&3.067\\ \hline 4.233&0.236&37.660&3.534\\ \hline 4.885&0.205&40.133&4.074\\ \hline 5.638&0.177&42.608&4.699\\ \hline 6.506&0.154&45.084&5.420\\ \hline 7.509&0.133&47.561&6.253\\ \hline 8.665&0.115&50.038&7.215\\ \hline 10.000&0.100&52.516&8.326\\ \hline \end{array}}
 

Attachments

  • recession.png
    recession.png
    7.7 KB · Views: 507
Last edited:
As always Marcos. another well presented tutorial and much appreciated, Thank You.

Yogi.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top