Circular interference from the equation of a hyperbola

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical modeling of interference patterns created by two point sources, specifically focusing on hyperbolas generated from these patterns. Participants explore methods to derive equations for multiple hyperbolas associated with given foci, considering the context of wave interference in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an "easy" method to derive equations for hyperbolas created by interference patterns, given the closest hyperbola.
  • Another participant suggests a manual method to find focal points by substituting variables to convert the hyperbola equation into standard form.
  • A participant clarifies that their inquiry is about determining all hyperbolas associated with the foci, not just finding the foci themselves, and mentions the relevance of wavelength in the context.
  • Further elaboration includes a suggestion to calculate distance differences for various hyperbolas based on the known equation and relative phases of the emitters.
  • One participant points out a potential error in a diagram related to maximum constructive interference, asserting that it should depict straight lines rather than hyperbolas.
  • Another participant agrees with the previous comment, emphasizing that the loci of maximum constructive interference are hyperbolic in certain contexts, while also noting the limitations of the straight-line approximation from Young's Experiment.
  • A later reply indicates a realization that the problem may be simpler than initially thought, suggesting a shift in understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the interference patterns, with some asserting that maximum constructive interference should be represented by straight lines, while others maintain that hyperbolas are appropriate in specific scenarios. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to derive the equations for the hyperbolas.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and diagrams, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the conditions under which the hyperbolas apply, as well as the implications of wavelength on the derived equations.

dimestorelaser
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I had a question that I can't seem to find an answer too.
I was hoping people could point me in the right direction, or let me know if there is an "easy" method.

It has to do with the classic example of two stones in water producing constructive and destructive interference patterns, which create a hyperbola.

If we are given the closest hyperbola created by the interference patterns. Is there an "easy" way...to generate the equations for the other hyperbola that are also created?

Generally I have just been plotting some circles and "guessing" at the other ones. However it seems like there should be a pretty easy method...since they all have the same focus right?

For example, I am trying to create the other hyperbolic arcs created at the same time is this mildly complex hyperbola:

y^2 = 4x^2 + 5x +632378Here is the wolframalpha of the equation:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y^2+=+4*x^2++5*x++632378
I would appreciate any feedback. Thank you!
 
Science news on Phys.org
There are formulas to get the focal points.

The manual way to find them: substitute ##z=x+\frac{5}{4} ## or equivalently ## x=z-\frac{5}{4}##, then ##4x^2 + 5x = 4z^2 -\frac{25}{16}##.
That allows to convert it to standard form easily and then you get your focal points. It is possible to pack everything together in formulas, too, even for rotated hyperbolas (where you get xy terms).
 
Hi thanks for the response,

Im not sure I was clear in what I was asking.

I know how to get the focus of the equation, that's not the question. My question is about the set of hyperbolas created by those foci. Consider a two point source at the locations of the foci, how do I determine the equations of ALL the hyperbolas associated with those foci. (Assuming that we have wavelength of 1).
d918506e-d8a8-4a4e-95a6-cd47ac408e38.gif
In the above picture...If I know the equation of N3...can I easily determine the equations for N2 and N1?

I appreciate the response. Thank you.
 
dimestorelaser said:
how do I determine the equations of ALL the hyperbolas associated with those foci. (Assuming that we have wavelength of 1).
The differences in distance to those foci have to be ... a-2, a-1, a, a+1, a+2, ... where a is some real number between 0 and 1, describing the relative phases of the emitters.

In the above picture...If I know the equation of N3...can I easily determine the equations for N2 and N1?
Calculate the distance difference for N3 and the focal points, reduce the distance difference by 1, 2, ... wavelengths.
 
HI thanks for the help, I appreciate it.

Would you mind working out the example I gave? I would help me to understand what you are saying. Thank you,
 
Hi, I think there is an error in your drawing - the loci of "maximum constructive interference" should be straight lines.
This diagram is from "Young's Experiment" on double slit interference.
10342.jpg


Did I misread your ideas?
 
bubsir said:
Hi, I think there is an error in your drawing - the loci of "maximum constructive interference" should be straight lines.
This diagram is from "Young's Experiment" on double slit interference.Did I misread your ideas?
The loci are hyperbolae, hence the Hyperbolic Radio Navigation Systems. The Young's slits pattern that you show is an approximation, and only holds when the distances are greater than the separation. Note that the pattern in the original diagram also gives straight lines, well outside the region of the two sources.
 
Nevermind...I realized its actually quite simple.
Thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K