Circular vs. Cylindrical Charge Distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison of electric fields generated by a disk of uniform charge density and a hollow cylinder. Both scenarios yield similar integrals for calculating the electric field along their respective axes, specifically E=∫(2*pi*sigma*z*r*dr)/(r^2+z^2)^(3/2) for the disk and E=∫(2*pi*sigma*R*z*dz)/(R^2+z^2)^(3/2) for the cylinder. The key observation is that the integrals are structurally similar, differing primarily in the constants R and z, and the charge density sigma. This similarity suggests a deeper relationship between the electric fields of circular and cylindrical charge distributions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and charge distributions
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of physics concepts related to electric potential and field lines
  • Experience with mathematical notation and symbols used in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of electric fields for different charge distributions, focusing on uniform charge density
  • Study the implications of symmetry in electric fields, particularly in circular and cylindrical geometries
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's Law in calculating electric fields for various shapes
  • Investigate the differences in electric field behavior between finite and infinite charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in electrostatics, particularly those studying electric fields generated by various charge distributions.

NullSpace0
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I recently had a problem set with two questions that seemed to give very similar answers. I'm not asking how to do this, so I don't think this post belongs in the homework section. Rather, I'm asking if the similarity I think I see has any deeper meaning in the physics of electric fields.

Let's say I want to find the electric field due to a disk of uniform charge density along the disk's axis. I would integrate and I end up getting something like:

E=∫(2*pi*sigma*z*r*dr)/(r^2+z^2)^3/2... note that z/sqrt(r^2+z^2) comes in from multiplying by the cosine of the angle to get only the portion along the axis. In this integral, z is a constant.

For a hollow cylinder, you get essentially the same integral: E=∫(2*pi*sigma*R*z*dz)/(R^2+z^2)^(3/2)... again, note that R/sqrt(R^2+z^2) come from the cosine of the angle for similar reasons. In this case, R is a constant.

So they seem to be the same integral with R and z swapped out. Other than the fact that sigma is different in each case, does the similarity mean anything? It's almost like it's saying that a cylinder and a circle have basically the same electric field along the axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Or perhaps not?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
500
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
959
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
565
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K