B Clarification about Fractal Dimensions

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Tracey3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Fractal
Tracey3
Hi there, so recently we had professor's assistant covering our class and he decided to talk about Fractal Dimensions. Maybe its just the concept or his explenation but we all left the class bewildered to say the least.

Could someone clarify for me, how do we refer to the number of dimensions? My understanding was always that they are uniform integers 1,2,3. Based on what my current comprehension is, we have 1-3 dimensions? :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The Fractal dimension can be fractional and applies to spaces which may not be quite either 1- , 2- or n-dimensional, but somehow somewhere in-between.
 
The term fractal was coined by Benoit Mandelbrot in 1975, to express the concept of dimensions that could be fractional. Common geometric objects such as lines (dimension 1), planes (dimension 2), and spheres (dimension 3) have integral dimensions, but there are objects that have dimension somewhere between these integer values. Some examples are the Koch snowflake and Sierpinski carpet. The Koch snowflake is made up of line segments, but the snowflake itself is so convoluted that it can be thought of as filling an area. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top