Clarification needed: u-sub requires combining 2 constants

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rear Naked
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constants
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral ∫-x/(x+1) dx using u-substitution. The user successfully applies the substitution u=x+1, leading to the expression ln(x+1) - x + C. While the user expresses concern about the additional constant introduced during the substitution, it is confirmed that both their method and Wolfram's long division approach yield the same result. The discussion emphasizes that multiple techniques can be valid for finding antiderivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of u-substitution in calculus
  • Familiarity with integration techniques
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of long division in integration
  • Learn about different techniques for solving integrals
  • Explore the properties of logarithmic functions in calculus
  • Practice additional problems involving u-substitution
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those learning integration techniques, and educators looking for clarification on u-substitution methods.

Rear Naked
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate ∫-x/(x+1) dx

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I do a U-sub

u=x+1
du=dx
x=u-1

-∫(u-1)/u du

-∫[u/u - 1/u] du

-∫1 - 1/u du

-[∫1du - ∫1\u du]

-[u - ln(u) + C]

ln(u)-u+C

ln(x+1)-(x+1)+C

ln(x+1)-x-1+C

I combine -1 and C into a single C to get the final answer

ln(x+1) - x + CWolfram says the answer is correct, but its method is slightly different. It uses long division at the outset to go from -∫x/(x+1) dx → -∫1 - 1/(x+1) dx before seperating into 2 integrals, and doing a u-sub on the second. My answer ends up the same, but getting that extra -1 from substituting the (x+1) in for u is making me nervous for some reason, even though I ultimately combine it with the constant. Is my process equally correct (I think it is) or did I just get lucky with the solution?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Rear Naked said:

Homework Statement



Evaluate ∫-x/(x+1) dx


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I do a U-sub

u=x+1
du=dx
x=u-1

-∫(u-1)/u du

-∫[u/u - 1/u] du

-∫1 - 1/u du

-[∫1du - ∫1\u du]

-[u - ln(u) + C]

ln(u)-u+C

ln(x+1)-(x+1)+C

ln(x+1)-x-1+C

I combine -1 and C into a single C to get the final answer

ln(x+1) - x + C


Wolfram says the answer is correct, but its method is slightly different. It uses long division at the outset to go from -∫x/(x+1) dx → -∫1 - 1/(x+1) dx before seperating into 2 integrals, and doing a u-sub on the second.


My answer ends up the same, but getting that extra -1 from substituting the (x+1) in for u is making me nervous for some reason, even though I ultimately combine it with the constant. Is my process equally correct (I think it is) or did I just get lucky with the solution?

Thanks

Either approach can be taken to produce the antiderivative. Many times it is the case that more than one technique can be used.

Two comments:
1. You should connect the expressions you have with =.
2. In these lines --
ln(x+1)-x-1+C
ln(x+1) - x + C
-- C on the 2nd line is different from C on the first. What people usually do is write a different constant (e.g., C') to indicate that the new constant actually is different from the previous one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K