Clarification on induced current/Bfields for solenoids

  • Thread starter Thread starter aimslin22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induced
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding when to account for the number of turns in solenoid problems involving induced currents and magnetic fields. In the first problem, the total magnetic flux is calculated for a coil with multiple turns, requiring multiplication by the number of loops. In contrast, the second problem involves finding the flux per turn, leading to confusion when the turns are incorrectly factored in. The key takeaway is to consider the physical context of each problem; typically, calculations are for the entire coil rather than a single loop. This understanding clarifies how to approach similar problems in the future.
aimslin22
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm working on induced currents/b-fields from Lenz's Laws and two different problems use the same equation but one has an extra variable and I don't know when to add this equation.

Problem 1:
In a physics laboratory experiment, a coil with 180 turns enclosing an area of 11.6cm^2 is rotated during the time interval 3.10×10−2s from a position in which its plane is perpendicular to Earth's magnetic field to one in which its plane is parallel to the field. The magnitude of Earth's magnetic field at the lab location is 5.00×10−5T. What is the total magnitude of the magnetic flux ( Phi_initial) through the coil before it is rotated?

Problem 1:
Phi = BAcostheta
This relation is just for one loop, and when we are calculating the effect of all the loops in the coil we must remember to multiply by N, the total number of loops. In other words Phi_initial = N*Phi_1.

^Now this completely makes sense to me, but I just did another problem:

Problem 2:
A 100-turn 8 cm diameter coil is made of 0.5 mm diameter copper wire. A magnetic field is perpendicular to the coil. At what rate must B increase to induce a 2 A current in the coil?

I did this problem perfectly, but I I'm off by a factor of 100 because I divide my flux by 100 to account for the numbers of turns.

My question is: why do I need to account for the turns in one problem and not another? ie. In the future, how will I know what to do?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, in Problem 2, you first found the necessary flux. When you divide by the number of turns, you're finding the necessary flux per turn. You just want the flux, though, so it makes sense to not divide.

In the future, it usually works best to think about what's happening physically. For example, in the first problem, it makes sense that the flux through a coil with 100 loops ought to be 100 times more than the flux through just one loop, so it's good that you multiplied.

Most of the time, you are going to want to calculate things for the entire coil, not just for one loop.
 
I see. Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top