MHB Classical gases not necessarily ideal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Logan Land
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Gases
Logan Land
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Systems A, B, and C are classical gases (not necessarily ideal), each with the same number of molecules N ( or same number of moles n if you prefer), where N is constant. We can measure pressures and volumes Pa,Va ; Pb,Vb ; and Pc,Vc for each system. When A and B are in thermal equilibrium, our measurements show that their pressure and volumes satisfy:
PbVb-(beta)Pb-(alpha)Vb+(alpha)(beta)-PaVa=0

When A and C are in thermal equilibrium, we find:
PcVc-PaVa-((gamma)PaVa)/Pc=0

where (alpha),(beta), and (gamma) are constants.
Find the equation relating Pb,Vb and Pc,Vc that is satisfied when system B and C are in thermal equilibrium.
Would I just set the equation for AB = AC and move the B and C's to one said and A to the other?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
LLand314 said:
Systems A, B, and C are classical gases (not necessarily ideal), each with the same number of molecules N ( or same number of moles n if you prefer), where N is constant. We can measure pressures and volumes Pa,Va ; Pb,Vb ; and Pc,Vc for each system. When A and B are in thermal equilibrium, our measurements show that their pressure and volumes satisfy:
PbVb-(beta)Pb-(alpha)Vb+(alpha)(beta)-PaVa=0

When A and C are in thermal equilibrium, we find:
PcVc-PaVa-((gamma)PaVa)/Pc=0

where (alpha),(beta), and (gamma) are constants.
Find the equation relating Pb,Vb and Pc,Vc that is satisfied when system B and C are in thermal equilibrium.
Would I just set the equation for AB = AC and move the B and C's to one said and A to the other?

Hi LLand314!

Not quite. Then you would still have an equation with Pa,Va in it.

The "trick" is to "eliminate" Pa,Va.

If you have for instance:
x-y=3
x-z=5
then you can "eliminate" x as follows.

We can rewrite the first equation as x=y+3.
Substitute that in the second equation to get (y+3)-z=5.
And now we have a relation between y and z, without x.

The same thing applies to your equation, where you should try to eliminate PaVa.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top