Classical Mechanics: Textbook Recs & Study Tips

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges of studying classical mechanics, particularly Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics, as the semester approaches. Participants express difficulty with the dense material and the unavailability of the prescribed textbook. Recommendations for introductory textbooks include Marion & Thornton, Goldstein, and Hand & Finch, with Marion & Thornton noted for its concrete examples and problem-solving utility. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the Lagrangian as the difference between kinetic and potential energy, and the Hamiltonian as total energy, while emphasizing the need for solving differential equations. Study tips shared include completing all assigned homework, working on additional problems, reading ahead, and engaging with solved examples. Some participants critique the Kibble textbook for its lack of examples and difficulty, contrasting it with other recommended texts that provide more support for students. Overall, the thread underscores the perceived difficulty of classical mechanics and the importance of effective study strategies and resources.
diffusion
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I can already tell this semester is going to be a rough one. With two weeks until the semester begins, I've been attempting to work through the notes for my classical mechanics course (lagrangian & hamiltonian mechanics). Wow. Really dense stuff. I'm having a pretty difficult time following the concepts, and the textbook they've prescribed cannot be found anywhere. So, I've started this thread for two reasons:

1) Could anyone recommend a decent introductory classical mechanics textbook(s)?

2) I'd like to hear your experiences with classical mechanics. Is it really a difficult course? Any study tips you could share?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will probably be easier with explanation from the instructor. Lagrangian really isn't so bad... you basically subtract the potential energy from the kinetic and solve a 1st order differential equation for the motion.

As for textbooks, my first intro to L+H was Marion & Thornton, it seemed to work alright. My second time through it was Goldstein, also alright.
 
Marion & Thornton and Hand & Finch are two good books for first-time Classical Mechanics.

As Mororvia points out, the Lagrangian is generally the difference between kinetic and potential energies (there can be cases where it's not, though you'll likely not see them in your first time through) and will be solving one second order differential equations, not first order (it's D_t^2x=-\omega^2x, not D_tx=-\omega^2x!).
The Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics is usually the total energy (it is not the total energy if the Lagrangian depends on time explicitly) and you'll be solving two first order differential equations.

Tips for doing well:
--Do all the homework the professor assigns
--Do problems the professor doesn't assign for help
--Read ahead always
--Work out the solved examples in your text on your own & compare results
--Don't be afraid to ask questions
 
Oops. Yes, second order. Thats what I get for not reviewing after its been so long! Sorry for any confusion.
 
I have made a thread on online CM resources:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=349852My generic booklist for CM would be:

Begginer:
Classical Mechanics-Gregory
Classical Mechanics-Kibble

Intermediate:
Classical Dynamics-Jose/Saletan
Mechanics-Scheck
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics-Arnold(if you dare)

EDIT: What is your obscure book, anyway?
 
Pinu7 said:
Intermediate:
Classical Dynamics-Jose/Saletan
Mechanics-Scheck
Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics-Arnold(if you dare)

You are brave to call Jose/Saletan & Arnold "Intermediate." We used Jose/Saletan for my graduate mechanics course and I don't understand much of it (fortunately, I had Marion & Thornton, Greiner, and Goldstein at my disposal to learn the mechanics part and Frankel's Geometry of Physics to learn the differential geometry part). I would label these "Advanced" with emphasizing a lot of mathematical background, specifically differential geometry.

Now that I mention it, the Greiner series and Landau/Lifschitz series are excellent books for all of their subject areas (I think Greiner is better than Landau b/c the latter tends to be very wordy).
 
How would you compare Kibble to Marion and Thornton? So far, I'm noticing that Marion and Thornton seem more useful for specific problems since it seems to have more concrete examples. Especially on things like many-body systems
 
Simfish said:
How would you compare Kibble to Marion and Thornton? So far, I'm noticing that Marion and Thornton seem more useful for specific problems since it seems to have more concrete examples. Especially on things like many-body systems

Alot of my physics major friends took CM with the Kibble book and hated it, the professor specifically chose Kibble because it didn't have a lot of examples nor a solutions manual and my friends all found it very difficult to study for the course (though the fact the professor gave 6 exams not including the final might've had something to do with it).
 
Back
Top