Classical spin system. Ising model.

AI Thread Summary
The energy function ##E=-S_1S_2## indicates that when spins are aligned parallel, the energy becomes negative. This negative energy arises from the choice of reference level, which in this case is set to zero for the spin system. Similar to gravitational potential energy, where reference levels can vary, the energy in spin systems can also be adjusted by shifting the reference point. By introducing a constant, the energy can be expressed as ##E=const-JS_1S_2##, allowing for flexibility in interpretation. Ultimately, understanding energy in this context requires recognizing the importance of reference levels.
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Energy function ##E=-S_1S_2##. I took ##J=1##. If spin are oriented parallel energy is negative. How could energy be negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy scales are often relative. The reference level in the spin system is set to zero.

It's similar to how when talking about gravitational potential energy (close to earth) we typically set our reference energy level to ground level, so that energies are positive. However, when talking about gravitational potential energies between planets, etc., we often chose our reference level to be at infinite separations, so that the energy is negative.

However, we can always shift these energies by a constant energy level (equivalent to shifting our reference level).
 
If I understand you well you can always put ##E=const-JS_1S_2##. I just sometimes say ##const=0##.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top