B Clever Geometry in this Video

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Video
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the impressive setup and movement of balls in a video, with participants expressing skepticism about the feasibility of achieving such precision by hand. Many believe the initial arrangement of the balls suggests advanced technology, possibly involving electromagnets or computerized systems. It is revealed that the video is actually CGI, with references to similar Marble Madness videos available online. Participants note the increasing realism of animated content, leading to confusion about what is real versus CGI. There is a call for clearer labeling of CGI in video titles to help viewers distinguish between animated and real footage.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,415
Reaction score
2,790
Something I never would have suspected.

 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and jedishrfu
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not as impressed by how they are moving now as I am that the balls were initially set up perfectly.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
FactChecker said:
I'm not as impressed by how they are moving now as I am that the balls were initially set up perfectly.
I thought the same. I'd think you'd have to have the balls held by electromagnets that are then released sequentially. It seems virtually impossible to do this by hand. Having the channels made so precisely that the balls all move the same way must also be some computerized thing.

It may have been inspired by this simulation done 3 years prior.

 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Guys, it's CGI. These kinds of Marble Madness videos are all over the innertoobs.




This one is actually labeled "CGI animation":


 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman, FactChecker and Hornbein
DaveC426913 said:
Guys, it's CGI. These kinds of Marble Madness videos are all over the innertoobs.
Now I feel like a caveman confused by fire. A lot of the animated Youtube videos have fooled me recently. They have become incredibly realistic. This one is clearly identified as animated using Blender in the Youtube description. I wish that Youtube had a policy that the title indicate CGI.
 
  • Haha
Likes DaveC426913
I once looked into Blender. I concluded that life was too short to learn Blender.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top