Surviving the Fall: The Physics of Cliffhanger's Epic Ending

In summary, the conversation revolves around whether a person could survive a fall from a helicopter right before it crashes. The speaker believes that the person has a chance of survival due to the helicopter's slower fall and the protection it provides. However, others argue that the person would still face a significant impact and likely not survive.
  • #1
jimmy p
Gold Member
399
66
I'm not sure if a similar question has been asked before but here goes.

I was watching Cliffhanger the other night, and right at the end, the John Lithgow character plummets to his doom on top of helicopter. This sparked a discussion with my housemate as to whether he could survive the fall if he jumped off the helicopter right at the point of impact with the ground, disregarded debris and the inevitable explosion. For some reason I have it in my head that he can survive, where my housemate (probably rightly so) believes that it doesn't matter, he will die.

Who is right and why? (if that really needs to be answered)

thanks

JP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This depends on the speed of the crash. Assuming the helicopter is heavy enough jumping at the last second will only decrease your velocity at impact by about 3 m/s (the vertical velocity you reach initialy when jumping).
 
  • #3
Remember that, just before hitting the ground, you have the downward speed of the helicopter. Jumping out of the helicopter when it is a few inches off the ground is not as falling just those few inches. As DavidK said, you could only decrease your rate of fall slightly by your upward jump.
 
  • #4
It also begs the question - would he be likely to survive the fall if he stayed in the helicopter? We intuit that it will kill him, but I'm not so sure. Why do we presume that a freefall of equal height might not kill him?

Consider the relative benefits of being in a helicopter:

1] A helicopter, while we think of it as a massive piece of machinery - is extremely light for its size (it's carefully built that way). This would make it an object that actually falls a fair bit slower than a human. Even mangled, the rotors still provide significant air resistance. I'll bet if you dropped a human and a helicopter from the same height, the human would hit much sooner (faster acceleration, plus higher terminal velocity). Helicopters, whle admittedly not experts at it, are still much better gliders than human bodies.

2] The helicopter would absorb the vast quantity of damage when it hit.


If one could minimize the subseqent squashing or battering inside a metal can - I would bet that a human would actually stand a much better chance of suriviving the initial impact if he were inside a helicopter than if he were freefalling.
 
  • #5
:blushing: I forgot that I asked this... thanks for the answers guys, looks like I lost the debate. I'm not going to tell him though :devil:
 

1. How realistic is the rock climbing in the movie "Cliffhanger"?

The rock climbing in "Cliffhanger" is not entirely realistic. While some of the techniques and equipment used are accurate, there are also many instances of unrealistic stunts and feats that would not be possible in real life.

2. Can a person really hold onto a rope with just their fingertips?

While it is possible for highly skilled climbers to hold onto small ledges or cracks with their fingertips, it is not a sustainable or safe technique. In the movie, the characters often use this technique for extended periods of time, which would not be possible in reality.

3. Are the avalanches and helicopter scenes accurate?

The avalanches and helicopter scenes in "Cliffhanger" are not entirely accurate. While some of the effects may be realistic, the timing and severity of the events are exaggerated for dramatic effect.

4. How would the characters realistically survive such extreme conditions?

In reality, the characters would not be able to survive the extreme conditions depicted in "Cliffhanger" without proper training and equipment. The cold temperatures, high altitudes, and dangerous terrain would make it extremely difficult for them to survive for extended periods of time.

5. Are the physics of the free-fall scenes accurate?

The free-fall scenes in "Cliffhanger" are not entirely accurate. While some aspects, such as the speed and trajectory of the fall, may be realistic, the characters are often able to perform stunts and maneuvers that would not be possible in real life.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
39K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top