Clifford algebra isomorphic to tensor algebra or exterior algebra?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a potential misprint in a paper regarding the isomorphism between Clifford algebra C(V) and tensor algebra T(V), with confusion arising from the use of the term "Lambda(V)." It is clarified that while C(V) and T(V) can be isomorphic as vector spaces, they are only isomorphic as algebras under specific conditions, particularly when the Clifford algebra is derived from the zero quadratic form. The dimension of both C(V) and T(V) is indeed 2^{dim(V)}, which adds to the confusion. Additionally, it is noted that a new product can be defined on Lambda(V) to establish an isomorphism with C(V). This highlights the nuanced relationship between these algebraic structures.
precondition
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Unfortunately there seems to be a misprint in the paper I'm reading which is an introduction to clifford algebra, it says:(I highlighted in red possible misprint, either one of them has to be true misprint if you know what I mean)

The Clifford algebra C(V) is isomorphic to the tensor algebra Lambda(V) and is therefore a 2^{dim(V)} dimensional vector space with generators blah blah blah...

Now, I know C(V) is defined as T(V)/I with you know what "I" so I'm wondering how can there be isomorphism between C(V) and T(V) but on the other hand dimension 2^{dim(V)} is indeed dimension of tensor algebra right? Also the author said tensor algebra but then wrote Lambda...-_-

I'm confused~~
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the names for \Lambda(V) is the "antisymmetric tensor algebra (over V)".


Incidentally, while they are always isomorphic as vector spaces, I think they are only isomorphic as algebras when the Clifford algebra is built from the zero quadratic form.
 
Hurkyl said:
Incidentally, while they are always isomorphic as vector spaces, I think they are only isomorphic as algebras when the Clifford algebra is built from the zero quadratic form.

Yes.

Somtimes the vector space isomorphism between Cl(V) and \Lambda(V) is exploited by defining a second product on (vector space) \Lambda(V) that makes (vector space) \Lambda(V) with new product isomorphic to Cl(V).
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
940
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
878
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K