A Climate change and changes in astronomical viewing conditions....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights concerns about the impact of climate change on ground-based astronomy and observatory sites. There is a need for research on how climate change may affect current optimal locations for telescopes, particularly regarding increased cloud cover over the next 30 to 50 years. Currently, mountain tops remain ideal for optical observatories, while deserts are preferred for radio and infrared observatories due to their flat terrain and distance from urban areas. Coastal observatories may face challenges from rising sea levels, but they are generally considered sub-optimal locations. Ultimately, orbital telescopes are viewed as the most effective solution for avoiding terrestrial weather issues.
pioneerboy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
I'd like to read some articles, papers, or whatever scientific there is about the prospects and impacts of climate change for professional ground based astronomy and observatory sites. In particular, which locations which are now among the most suitable sites for observatories - especially building new ones - will suffer from more frequent cloud cover in 30 to 50 years and on the other hand, which locations that are now suboptimal will be the premier sites to build major professional telescopes. I couldn't find anything with any climate modelling scenarios in this regard, but would really get some insights in this. Thank you for any help.
 
  • Like
Likes e.bar.goum
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't think there is anything that specific. Projected impact for climate change is currently (iirc) general.

With that in mind:
Currently ideal sites for optical observatories are on top of mountains (above cloud layers and away from cities) ... there does not seem to be any reason to think this will change.
Optimum sites for radio and IR observatories have been large deserts ... mostly because of the large quantity of cheap flat ground away from cities. Again, this is unlikely to change with the climate for established sites ... though available desert may move around.

Currently used sites that are close to coasts may have to move - you know, with everyone else - should sea-levels rise... but these are sub-optimal anyway.

Current optial placement for any kind of telescope, however, is: in orbit.
Contact with orbital telescopes can vary with the weather.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top