Climbing with Rope: Shock Dynamics Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter billyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Rope
AI Thread Summary
Climbing with a short length of rope increases the shock load during a fall, as there is less rope to absorb the energy. Conversely, a longer rope reduces the shock on the climber due to a greater length available for expansion, even though the fall distance is greater. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding shock dynamics in climbing safety. A hypothetical scenario is posed regarding the effectiveness of a one-mile rope in a fall, raising questions about practical limits. Intuition in assessing these dynamics is highlighted as being more crucial than relying solely on formulas.
billyboy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello
I often go climbing. When I went with a guide recently he told me that you should be especially carefull when climbing when you only have a small length of rope paid out arguing that because the rope is so short at this point it must take a large shock under a fall. Conversley, if you have a lot of rope paid out, although you will fall further the shock on the rope will be less because the rope has a larger length over which to expand. I think I have solved the problem and just wanted to see if you guys come up with the same answer. Can anyone come up with a quantitative relation to prove the above?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
let take the case to the extreme... if you have a loooooong rope about 1mile to extent and you fall... do you think the rope could save you after falling down a mile??

something using intuition is more important than using formulas to solve problemmmmm
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top