Closed Form Solution for Series with Exponential and Power Terms?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rman144
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around finding a closed form solution for the series \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{e^{-(nx)^2}}{n^{1-m}}\), where \(m\) is an integer and \(0

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in a closed form solution and suggests a theta-type function, but struggles to find matching identities.
  • Another participant questions the definition of "closed form" and discusses the convergence behavior of the series for different values of \(x\), suggesting that for \(x>1\) the series converges quickly, while for \(x<1\) it may have many terms with increasing magnitude before decreasing.
  • A participant reflects on the utility of finding another representation of the series and inquires about additional constraints on \(m\) beyond it being an integer.
  • One suggestion is made to replace the exponential term with its Taylor series and consider switching the order of summation as a potential approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to find a closed form solution, and multiple competing views regarding the utility and representation of the series remain present.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the behavior of the series may depend significantly on the values of \(x\) and \(m\), and there are unresolved questions regarding the implications of these parameters.

rman144
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
[tex]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(-1)^{n}\frac{e^{-(nx)^2}}{n^{1-m}}[/tex]

Where m is an integer and 0<x<oo. I need a closed form solution, and was thinking something along the lines of a theta-type function, but cannot seem to locate any identities that match. Anyone have a suggestion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rman144,

I'm curious what you consider "closed form" and what you will use it for (analysis, numerics, etc.). Clearly, for x>1 this is an excellent representation that converges quickly - I would be surprised if a theta function (or hypergeometric or a G-function or ...) would be any "simpler" in reality or easier to compute, although on paper you may be able to write a small number of special functions, at best. Of course for x<1 the series may leave something to be desired, as I am pretty sure it can have a large number of terms with increasing magnitude before the terms start to decrease.

Just curious.

Jason
 
rman144,

I just re-read my post - it sounds like I am questioning the utility of finding another representation of the series. I didn't mean it that way - honest! I'm guessing most of us have been in a similar situation of looking for a nicer representation that may yield more insight, allow us to use well documented properties of known functions, allow us to use code we already have to compute it, etc. Anyway, I really am curious about the source of the series. Also, are there any other constraints on m beyond being an integer (even/odd, positive/negative)?

Regards,

Jason
 
Perhaps replace the exponential by its Taylor series, switch the double sums? It's something to try.
 
Lol, I took no offense. Thank you for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K