Closed Universe? Local H0 Measurements & Relativistic Corrections

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a paper suggesting that cosmological distances to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) may be miscalculated due to unaccounted lensing effects, potentially explaining the discrepancy between local and cosmological measurements of the Hubble constant. It posits that these lensing effects could indicate a closed universe. Participants express curiosity about the percentage of CMB photons that reach Earth without interacting with matter, as well as the implications for CMB temperature and black body shape. The conversation also references the work of Rees & Sciama, highlighting how density perturbations can affect photon behavior, leading to a net blue-shift. The discussion concludes with a request for clarification on the concept of gravitational wells becoming shallower due to cosmic expansion.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
In this paper; http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7860, What is the distance to the CMB? How relativistic corrections remove the tension with local H0 measurements, it is suggested cosmological distance may be miscalculated due to failure to take into account systematic accumulation of lensing effects. The authors go on to suggest this may explain the tension between local and cosmological measurements of the Hubble constant and could mean the universe may, in fact, be closed.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Interesting. Thanks, Chronos.
 
Thanks Chronos. I had wondered myself what percentage of the CMB photons make it to Earth without interacting with matter along the way and how much this distorts the CMB temperature and black body shape?
 
Last edited:
I view this as consistent with Rees & Sciama [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1968ApJ...153L...1R], who noted that large density perturbations interposed between the CMB surface and an observer can have an effect if the fluctuations change while photons traverse them. They experience more blue-shift infalling than when climbing out because expansion makes the wells shallower, giving rise to a net blue-shift of CMB photons. A similar effect can accumulate as photons pass through interposing gravitational lenses.
 
Chronos said:
... expansion makes the wells shallower ...

Can you elabort on how expansion makes a well shallower? (Wider I get, and steeper on the way in than on the way out, I understand.)

Thanks in advance.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top