Coefficient of a polynomial in K[x] where K is a field of characteristic p

rukawakaede
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Let K be a field of characteristic p.

Suppose f(x)=(xk+ck-1xk-1+...+c0)(xp-k+...) in K[x] with 1≤k≤p-1.

My question is:

1. since f(x) in K[x], can I conclude g(x)=xk+ck-1xk+...+c0 in K[x] as well?

2. We see that in general if g(x)=xk+ck-1xk-1+...+c0 then ck-1=-(α12+...+αk) where α11,...,αk are the root of g(x).

Now if ck-1∈K, can I conclude that α11,...,αk∈K as well?

very appreciated if someone could solve my confusion.
Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rukawakaede! :smile:

I'm not sure where these questions come from, so I don't know if I interpreted them correctly:

rukawakaede said:
Let K be a field of characteristic p.

Suppose f(x)=(xk+ck-1xk+...+c0)(xp-k+...) in K[x] with 1≤k≤p-1.

My question is:

1. since f(x) in K[x], can I conclude g(x)=xk+ck-1xk+...+c0 in K[x] as well?

Take K=\mathbb{F}_2 and take f(X)=X2+X+1. Then f splits in a field extension of K, that is, we have

f(X)=(X-\alpha_1)(X-\alpha_2)

but we won't have that (X-\alpha_i) in K[X] (otherwise \alpha_i\in \mathbb{F}_2 which cannot be).

2. We see that in general if g(x)=xk+ck-1xk+...+c0 then ck-1=-(α12+...+αk) where α11,...,αk are the root of g(x).

Now if ck-1∈K, can I conclude that α11,...,αk∈K as well?

No, see my previous example. Another example which is not in char 2, is the polynomial X^2+1 in \mathbb{R}. The sum of the roots is i-i=0, but neither i nor -i are in \mathbb{R}...
 
micromass said:
Hi rukawakaede! :smile:

I'm not sure where these questions come from, so I don't know if I interpreted them correctly:
Take K=\mathbb{F}_2 and take f(X)=X2+X+1. Then f splits in a field extension of K, that is, we have

f(X)=(X-\alpha_1)(X-\alpha_2)

but we won't have that (X-\alpha_i) in K[X] (otherwise \alpha_i\in \mathbb{F}_2 which cannot be).
No, see my previous example. Another example which is not in char 2, is the polynomial X^2+1 in \mathbb{R}. The sum of the roots is i-i=0, but neither i nor -i are in \mathbb{R}...

Thanks micromass!

I understand what you said.

In fact the polynomial is given as f(x)=xp-x-a where a∈K.

I want to show that ck-1∈K implies f(x) has a root in K but stuck here.

Since p=2 case is trivial. does that means we can show this by induction?Could you please give some suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Ok, rukawakaede, the polynomials you mention are called "Artin-Schreier polynomials" and are very well studied.

In general, if we have the polynomial X^p-X+\alpha and if \beta is one root of the polynomia (in some field extension of K)l, then we know all the roots:

\beta,\beta+1,...,\beta+p-1

this is essentially Fermat's little theorem. So let

L=K[x]/(X^p-X+\alpha)

then L is the field extension which contains all the roots of the polynomial. Can you solve your question now? Tell me if you need more hints...
 
micromass said:
Ok, rukawakaede, the polynomials you mention are called "Artin-Schreier polynomials" and are very well studied.

In general, if we have the polynomial X^p-X+\alpha and if \beta is one root of the polynomia (in some field extension of K)l, then we know all the roots:

\beta,\beta+1,...,\beta+p-1

this is essentially Fermat's little theorem. So let

L=K[x]/(X^p-X+\alpha)

then L is the field extension which contains all the roots of the polynomial. Can you solve your question now? Tell me if you need more hints...

I know if K adjoint a root of f(x), called it α, then in fact K(α) consists all of its roots, i.e. K(α,α+1,...,α+(p-1))=K(α) and so K(α) is the splitting field of f(x).

Now I have question:
if ck-1, as defined above, is in K, then we said the polynomial f(x) splits in K[x]?I am not fully understand, in particular, how can I show the implication ck-1∈K implies f(x) has a root in K?
 
Last edited:
micromass thanks!
I am now fully understood.
Thank you very much, especially for telling me the name of the polynomial. Learned extra stuff! :)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top