I Coherent Photons: Uncertainty and Locality

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Marrrrrrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coherent Photons
Marrrrrrr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I understand that laser is based on the phenomenon of coherence. But I wonder how, say, two photons could be said to be located at the exact same spot when their locations could not be precisely defined due to the principle of uncertainty.

To specify, which between the following two would be closer to the truth?

(1) They are "roughly" located at the same spot, which is enough for practical purposes.

(2) They are quite literally at the exact same spot, although it is not well-defined precisely at which spot they are colocated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marrrrrrr said:
I wonder how, say, two photons could be said to be located at the exact same spot

They can't. But that's not what "coherence" means. It means, heuristically, that you have many photons in the same quantum state, not many photons at the same position.
 
PeterDonis said:
They can't. But that's not what "coherence" means. It means, heuristically, that you have many photons in the same quantum state, not many photons at the same position.
Okay, thanks. But isn't it that one of those quantum states they share is about their positions?
 
Marrrrrrr said:
isn't it that one of those quantum states they share is about their positions?

There is only one quantum state involved. Strictly speaking, it's not a state that is "shared" by all the photons: it's a single quantum state of the many-photon system. (Really strictly speaking, this state does not even have a definite photon number, but that's probably going deeper than we need to here.)

As for position, there is no well-defined position operator for photons (or for any massless particles), so no, the quantum state in question is not about positions in any useful sense.
 
Marrrrrrr said:
I understand that laser is based on the phenomenon of coherence. But I wonder how, say, two photons could be said to be located at the exact same spot when their locations could not be precisely defined due to the principle of uncertainty. ...

:welcome:

Presumably you know that the photons in a laser are said to be in phase, and will have the same polarization.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top