Coils & Questions: Charging Batteries with Magnets

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter secondfret
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of generating electrical current using coils and magnets, specifically exploring the feasibility of charging batteries through the interaction of moving steel objects with stationary magnets within a coil. The scope includes theoretical exploration and practical implications of electromagnetic induction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a method of charging a battery by passing a heavy steel object over a coil wrapped around stationary magnets, suggesting that this could create a traveling flux in the magnetic field.
  • Another participant predicts that the changing magnetic flux from the steel object will be significantly less than that from moving magnets, leading to insufficient current generation for practical battery charging.
  • A further suggestion involves using a large coil with small magnets attached to its inner surface, questioning whether passing a steel object through this setup would yield any electrical output.
  • One participant questions the rationale behind using additional metal in the system, given that magnets are already metallic.
  • Another participant clarifies that the use of moving metal objects is a limitation rather than an advantage in the proposed setup.
  • A participant notes that moving metal objects will generate eddy currents, which could lead to energy losses, likening the metal to a shorted coil that dissipates energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of using moving steel objects to generate current, with some questioning the practicality and efficiency of the proposed methods. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of the concepts presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the interaction between moving metal and magnetic fields, as well as the potential energy losses due to eddy currents, which have not been fully explored or quantified.

secondfret
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, you know those flashlights that you shake to charge the battery? I'm no physics major, but I get the basic idea. The magnet is passed through the coil, creating an electrical current. So here's my question:
Imagine I changed the structure of the coil a bit. If I take a series of magnets (arranged in a straight line), wrap a coil around them, and then pass a heavy steel object rapidly over the coil, will it have the same effect? Grant it, the magnets aren't moving inside the coil, but the steel object outside the coil will interact with each magnet inside the coil as it passes over them, creating a traveling flux in the magnetic field inside the coil. So just like in the flashlight, there's an constantly changing magnetic field inside a coil of wires connected to a battery. Will it charge the battery?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I imagine the changing flux will be significantly less than for the case of moving magnets, and thus the current generated will be significantly less. I predict you couldn't generate enough current to charge the battery enough to be practical.

Any particular reason you ask? Did you have some kind of device in mind?
 
Oh you know, glory, riches and solving the energy crisis. But I guess you've brought me back down to Earth. Let's look at this one more way. Forgive my ignorance if this is poses the exact same problem.

This time I have a large coil in which small magnets are attached to every inch of the inner surface. Now I pass a steel object rapidly through the coil... anything?

As you can see I'm trying to create a coil that generates electricity without the benefit of a moving magnet. I can only use moving metal objects. Any insight?
 
I don't see any advantage to this. Magnets are metallic, so why do you prefer to have additional metal in there?
 
It's not an advantage, it's a limitation :)
Forgive me for being purposely vague
 
You'll find that whatever the mechanism there's a force between the moving object and the coils by which the mechanical energy is being converted (via negative work) to the electrical energy. Or as Larry Niven's Lunies would say: "TANSTAAFL"
 
Let me add, that any metal you have moving around the magnets will have eddy currents generated within them since they are conductors as well as potentially ferromagnetic. This will add greatly to the loss of energy in whateveritisyourtryingtodo. Think of the piece of metal as a coil which is shorted out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K