Coils & Questions: Charging Batteries with Magnets

  • Thread starter Thread starter secondfret
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of generating electricity using a coil and magnets by moving a heavy steel object over the coil instead of moving the magnets themselves. It is noted that while the steel object may create a changing magnetic field, the resulting current generated would likely be insufficient for practical charging of a battery. The concept of using a coil with small magnets attached to its inner surface is also explored, but it is suggested that this approach may not provide any advantages and could introduce additional energy losses due to eddy currents in the moving metal. The conversation emphasizes the inherent limitations of relying solely on moving metal objects for energy generation. Ultimately, the consensus is that the proposed methods are unlikely to be effective for practical energy generation.
secondfret
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, you know those flashlights that you shake to charge the battery? I'm no physics major, but I get the basic idea. The magnet is passed through the coil, creating an electrical current. So here's my question:
Imagine I changed the structure of the coil a bit. If I take a series of magnets (arranged in a straight line), wrap a coil around them, and then pass a heavy steel object rapidly over the coil, will it have the same effect? Grant it, the magnets aren't moving inside the coil, but the steel object outside the coil will interact with each magnet inside the coil as it passes over them, creating a traveling flux in the magnetic field inside the coil. So just like in the flashlight, there's an constantly changing magnetic field inside a coil of wires connected to a battery. Will it charge the battery?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I imagine the changing flux will be significantly less than for the case of moving magnets, and thus the current generated will be significantly less. I predict you couldn't generate enough current to charge the battery enough to be practical.

Any particular reason you ask? Did you have some kind of device in mind?
 
Oh you know, glory, riches and solving the energy crisis. But I guess you've brought me back down to Earth. Let's look at this one more way. Forgive my ignorance if this is poses the exact same problem.

This time I have a large coil in which small magnets are attached to every inch of the inner surface. Now I pass a steel object rapidly through the coil... anything?

As you can see I'm trying to create a coil that generates electricity without the benefit of a moving magnet. I can only use moving metal objects. Any insight?
 
I don't see any advantage to this. Magnets are metallic, so why do you prefer to have additional metal in there?
 
It's not an advantage, it's a limitation :)
Forgive me for being purposely vague
 
You'll find that whatever the mechanism there's a force between the moving object and the coils by which the mechanical energy is being converted (via negative work) to the electrical energy. Or as Larry Niven's Lunies would say: "TANSTAAFL"
 
Let me add, that any metal you have moving around the magnets will have eddy currents generated within them since they are conductors as well as potentially ferromagnetic. This will add greatly to the loss of energy in whateveritisyourtryingtodo. Think of the piece of metal as a coil which is shorted out.
 
Back
Top