Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This forum discussion centers around a collection of science jokes, particularly those involving mathematics and physics. Notable jokes include a mathematician with a dog and cow discussing knot theory, and a play on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The humor often relies on advanced concepts such as the Jones polynomial and topological invariants, showcasing a blend of wit and scientific terminology. The conversation also touches on the cultural significance of these jokes within the scientific community.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of knot theory and the Jones polynomial
  • Familiarity with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
  • Basic knowledge of topology and topological invariants
  • Awareness of mathematical humor and its conventions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of knot theory in mathematics
  • Learn about the Jones polynomial and its applications
  • Study Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of humor in scientific communication
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of humor and science will benefit from this discussion.

  • #3,241
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,242
Orodruin said:
That’s not ISO standard.

(ISO standard would be 20231231)
MJD 60309
 
  • #3,243
jbriggs444 said:
MJD 60309
That’s not ISO standard either 😏
 
  • #3,244
jbriggs444 said:
MJD 60309
Too long, couldn't memorize.
Just look at the newspaper or computer screen, it's easier. :doh:
 
  • #3,245
From Facebook today; I thought about posting in Lame Jokes, but this is really a science joke... :smile:

1704156523265.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Swamp Thing, phinds and 2 others
  • #3,246
Science jokes are often misplaced in the lame joke bin.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42 and berkeman
  • #3,247
Some may consider math and computer jokes as subsets of science (kind of like STEM).
In that case, I consider the more specific place to put them to be the better one (like test answers).
I think there are two threads on computer or information joke. Confusion is rampant!
 
  • #3,248
LOL, from Facebook today...

1704208702471.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, MatinSAR, Borg and 1 other person
  • #3,249
berkeman said:
LOL, from Facebook today...

View attachment 338011
Reminds me of the Get Smart intro.
Also two buttons, but only goes up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #3,250
Screenshot 2024-01-02 at 9.26.25 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action
  • #3,251
1704219955437.jpeg
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and berkeman
  • #3,252
circle around their star

Ellipse, technically... :wink:
 
  • #3,253
... that the tilt is back in place, actually.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
  • #3,254
_nc_ohc=YDyb75xJ4UoAX_1GDLg&_nc_ht=scontent-fra3-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, dextercioby and Orodruin
  • #3,255
I would have posted this as a joke, if ...

_nc_ohc=zzxFAiYomh8AX9li1v_&_nc_ht=scontent-fra3-2.jpg


... it wasn't so wrong. So let's make it a quiz:

Who can find the error?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and BillTre
  • #3,256
fresh_42 said:
I would have posted this as a joke, if ...

View attachment 338031

... it wasn't so wrong. So let's make it a quiz:

Who can find the error?
1744? By which time Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit had been dead for nearly a decade?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action
  • #3,257
jbriggs444 said:
1744? By which time Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit had been dead for nearly a decade?
Very good! Two more mistakes, but still not the one I was thinking of.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
  • #3,258
fresh_42 said:
Very good! Two more mistakes, but still not the one I was thinking of.
The Fahrenheit scale was not refined to its modern definition until 1776?
Or the reversal of the Celsius scale in 1743?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #3,259
jbriggs444 said:
The Fahrenheit scale was not refined to its modern definition until 1776?
Or the reversal of the Celsius scale in 1743?
The latter, yes.
However, unlike the modern Celsius scale, Celsius assigned a value of 0 °C to the boiling point of water and a value of 100 °C to the freezing point. The modern Celsius scale, in which the boiling point of water is assigned the value 100 °C and the freezing point is assigned the value 0 °C, was introduced by Carl von Linné, a friend of Celsius, shortly after his death in 1744.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and jbriggs444
  • #3,260
What is it with the USA using Fahrenheit, where a temperature of 100 is defined, as that inside a cow.
 
  • #3,261
I saw the photo and immediately thought Newton.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #3,262
fresh_42 said:
Who can find the error?
Also, he was 42, not 43 at his death.
 
  • #3,263
jack action said:
Also, he was 42, not 43 at his death.
Numerically however, the math works out that way; Zero-based versus One-based.
 
  • #3,264
Baluncore said:
What is it with the USA using Fahrenheit, where a temperature of 100 is defined, as that inside a cow.
What if the cow has fever?
 
  • #3,265
1704282849255.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, DrClaude, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #3,266
I believe that book was peer-reviewed, but not by scientists.
 
  • #3,267
Baluncore said:
I believe that book was peer-reviewed, but not by scientists.
But if it was given by God … who was the peer? 🤔
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #3,268
Screenshot 2024-01-02 at 11.14.45 PM.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #3,269
(Just a quick reminder to avoid religious topics at PF, even in the humor threads. Thanks) :wink:
 
  • #3,270
Screenshot 2024-01-03 at 8.16.16 AM.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 470 ·
16
Replies
470
Views
36K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K