Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread features a collection of science-related jokes, puns, and humorous anecdotes, primarily focusing on physics, mathematics, and engineering concepts. The discussion includes various types of jokes, some of which are derived from literature, while others are original contributions from participants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a joke about a mathematician, a dog, and a cow, highlighting the humor in knot theory.
  • Another participant introduces a joke about Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in a romantic context.
  • Several jokes reference mathematical conventions, such as the use of epsilon in calculus, with some participants seeking clarification on the humor.
  • A joke about a communication between Americans and Canadians illustrates a humorous misunderstanding, with historical context provided by a participant.
  • Participants discuss the nature of jokes, including the structure of short jokes and the implications of scientific terminology in humor.
  • There are multiple jokes involving Heisenberg, with one participant noting the brevity of a specific version of the joke.
  • A humorous take on a scientific method is shared, with some participants expressing curiosity about the referenced group of scientists.
  • Another joke involves a metaphorical description of a woman's experience during childbirth, framed in scientific terms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share jokes and humorous anecdotes without a clear consensus on any specific joke or concept. Some jokes prompt requests for clarification, indicating varying levels of understanding and appreciation for the humor presented.

Contextual Notes

Some jokes rely on specific scientific knowledge or conventions that may not be universally understood, leading to requests for explanations. The humor often hinges on wordplay and the intersection of scientific concepts with everyday situations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in science humor, particularly in physics and mathematics, may find this collection entertaining and thought-provoking.

  • #3,691
The Coolidge effect is a biological phenomenon seen in animals, whereby males exhibit renewed sexual interest whenever a new female is introduced, even after sex with prior but still available sexual partners.[1][2][3][4] To a lesser extent, the effect is also seen among females with regard to their mates.[3]

...In a 1974 letter,[9] behavioral endocrinologist Frank A. Beach claims to have introduced the term "Coolidge effect" in either 1958 or 1959.[10] He attributed the neologism to an old joke about Calvin Coolidge when he was President of the United States.[11]

The President and Mrs. Coolidge were being shown [separately] around an experimental government farm. When [Mrs. Coolidge] came to the chicken yard she noticed that a rooster was mating very frequently. She asked the attendant how often that happened and was told, "Dozens of times each day." Mrs. Coolidge said, "Tell that to the President when he comes by." Upon being told, the President asked, "Same hen every time?" The reply was, "Oh, no, Mr. President, a different hen every time." President: "Tell that to Mrs. Coolidge."
The joke appears in a 1972 book (Aggression in Man and Animals, by Roger N. Johnson, p. 94).[12]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0163104788904189?via=ihub
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/289...effect is the,dishabituation in women and men.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Baluncore
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,692
1735820373639.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, Ivan Seeking, gmax137 and 2 others
  • #3,693
Holiday project for the relativity forum:
https://xkcd.com/3033/

With respect to the rules about dangerous activities, pay careful attention to the alt text.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #3,694
Ibix said:
Holiday project for the relativity forum:
https://xkcd.com/3033/

With respect to the rules about dangerous activities, pay careful attention to the alt text.
Reported as spreading personal theory (considering the theoretical max number of folds of a standard paper being 7).
 
  • #3,695
Orodruin said:
Reported as spreading personal theory
Hey! xkcd is a perfectly valid technical reference.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds, gmax137, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #3,696
1736031547313.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur, BillTre, dwarde and 1 other person
  • #3,697
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, Borg, Ivan Seeking and 1 other person
  • #3,698
1736117042726.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, BillTre, jack action and 2 others
  • #3,699
collinsmark said:
I'm not sure if this officially qualifies as humor, since it is a real study. But I find the video hilarious. (Make sure to keep watching for at least 30 seconds or so.)
Ants beat humans when the humans are forbidden to communicate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #3,700
mfb said:
Ants beat humans when the humans are forbidden to communicate.
Right. The video is still funny though. I was expecting just sciencey stuff, but then got what looks like something out of a Benny Hill episode.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #3,701



 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking
  • #3,702
I never trusted polar coordinates.
It is circular logic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and jack action
  • #3,703
1736284729985.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jack action and dwarde
  • #3,704
Baluncore said:
You would need to have been aged about 17, and listening to Pink Floyd in 1973. That makes you about 70 now.
Or been about 10 at the time with a teenaged stereophile brother. Some of us youngests are head of our time.
 
  • #3,705
AIVa0Q7kNvgG7BDcE&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-fra5-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, collinsmark and BillTre
  • #3,706
Except step 8 being impossible …
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #3,707
Orodruin said:
Except step 8 being impossible …
Really? How disappointing :frown: I had already started to fold my own black hole...


Ps: read the topic of this thread again...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #3,708
Orodruin said:
Except step 8 being impossible …
Mythbusters managed 11. But started with a piece of paper that fit in an airplane hangar.
 
  • Wow
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, BillTre and fresh_42
  • #3,709
jbriggs444 said:
Mythbusters managed 11. But started with a piece of paper that fit in an airplane hangar.
The assumption I think is standard A4 or letter.
… although those would also fit in an airplane hangar …
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein, Borg, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #3,710
Even if you were somehow able to fold it as many times as you'd like, it still wouldn't work. You'd be turning the sheet into a thin, long thread. So you're not compacting the mass beyond the sixth fold, when an A4 most resembles a cube.
(that's the joke, I know, but being the ackchyually guy is the PF way)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #3,711
All doorways should have a warning sign: Walking through this doorway too slowly may cause you to diffract.
 
  • #3,712
Ivan Seeking said:
All doorways should have a warning sign: Walking through this doorway too slowly may cause you to diffract.
But if you're too fast you might use the doorway next to it!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #3,713
fresh_42 said:
But if you're too fast you might use the doorway next to it!
I think that's only if you have a split personality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #3,714
fresh_42 said:
But if you're too fast you might use the doorway next to it!
You could use both doorways, but only if nobody's looking.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and fresh_42
  • #3,715
phinds said:
I think that's only if you have a split personality.
Nope. I minimum of uncertainty is enough.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #3,716
KU-3MQ7kNvgErzolI&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-fra5-2.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and BillTre
  • #3,719
Why is it that everyone is perfectly fine with imaginary numbers, but throw in some imaginary physics and everyone gets an attitude?

But then I guess any physics that uses imaginary numbers is imaginary physics. This is getting complex.
 
  • Wow
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds and ohwilleke
  • #3,720
1736609164816.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, dwarde, phinds and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 470 ·
16
Replies
470
Views
36K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K