- 22,820
- 14,860
Whatever will you do when you need to count to 93716937?!?!Ibix said:I think I can only fold the lower joint or both, not the fully-independent flexibility required for this!
This forum discussion centers around a collection of science jokes, particularly those involving mathematics and physics. Notable jokes include a mathematician with a dog and cow discussing knot theory, and a play on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The humor often relies on advanced concepts such as the Jones polynomial and topological invariants, showcasing a blend of wit and scientific terminology. The conversation also touches on the cultural significance of these jokes within the scientific community.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, physicists, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of humor and science will benefit from this discussion.
Whatever will you do when you need to count to 93716937?!?!Ibix said:I think I can only fold the lower joint or both, not the fully-independent flexibility required for this!
I can get to 60,466,175 if I take my socks off. And I can open my mouth or something for another factor of 2.Orodruin said:Whatever will you do when you need to count to 93716937?!?!
Well! If you are including opposable, I can go all fingers spread and any combination of them on the same hand opposable (touching).Orodruin said:I get ##10^9## if controlling each joint completely independently. 3 joints per finger except thumb, which has 2, but is opposable so that’s another degree of freedom. That means 15 joints per hand so ##2^{30}-1##.
Can you lend me a 20? If you don't have a use for it?jack action said:it has been established that there is no real-world use for numbers higher than 10
As an amateur pianist, I long ago learned the fingering pattern for counting up to 31 in binary on my left hand (starting from the little finger as low-order digit) so I can do that without thinking about it, although I then have to convert the binary back to decimal when I want to know the total so far.Orodruin said:I can count to 1023 on my fingers …![]()
[ 06:03 ] You had the chance to use the correct term, "Chinese whispers" but you said Japanese Telephone Game, just like an AI model might have done.
bosom?jack action said:
Because we can't show you any pictures of it.
Freud.DaveC426913 said:bosom?
Sadly, we can't show you any pictures of those either.DaveC426913 said:bosom?
Unless you like to complicate things.phinds said:Uh ... ONE of those is wrong. "Anything that can be simple, will be simple". What Murphy would say is that anything that COULD be simple will NOT be simple.
Oh, I know what you mean ... <sigh>jack action said:Unless you like to complicate things.
Nonsense …fresh_42 said: