Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a collection of science-related jokes and humorous anecdotes shared among forum members. A notable joke features a mathematician with a dog and a cow who are claimed to be knot theorists, leading to a playful exchange with a bartender. Other jokes include puns related to physics, such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and light-hearted takes on mathematical concepts. The conversation also touches on the nature of humor in science, with members explaining the nuances of certain jokes, particularly those involving mathematical notation. Additionally, there are references to classic jokes that have circulated over the years, illustrating how humor can bridge complex scientific ideas with everyday life. Overall, the thread highlights the community's appreciation for clever wordplay and the joy of sharing science humor.
  • #3,721
What is the difference between Newtonian mechanics and Quantum mechanics?

Quantum mechanics have to use very tiny tools.
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and BillTre
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,722
uncanceled_units.png
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,723
jack action said:
Hubble constant says hello.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #3,724
Bandersnatch said:
Hubble constant says hello.
You mean ##2.2\cdot 10^{-18}## s-1?
 
  • #3,725
Orodruin said:
You mean ##2.2\cdot 10^{-18}## s-1?
First of all, that should be in Hertz. But you know as well as I do, that in all literature it is given as 7.2 furlongs per fortnight per gigafathom.
 
  • #3,726
From The Onion:

MAGA Enraged as Quantum Computers Come Out as Non-Binary

 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Tom.G, Borg, jack action and 3 others
  • #3,727
BillTre said:
From The Onion:

MAGA Enraged as Quantum Computers Come Out as Non-Binary

And regular computers rely on trans-istors. It's a woke minefield!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Borg, jack action, phinds and 1 other person
  • #3,728
Ibix said:
And regular computers rely on trans-istors. It's a woke minefield!
Yeah, but you have to remember that the times they are a changin'. Trans people aren't what they used to be.
 
  • #3,729
phinds said:
Yeah, but you have to remember that the times they are a changin'. Trans people aren't what they used to be.
Cis people are all the same (side), but the para people are opposed.
 
  • #3,730
1737050557775.png
 
  • Like
Likes jack action and BillTre
  • #3,731
Screenshot 2025-01-16 at 10.39.33 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and gmax137
  • #3,732
BillTre said:
From The Onion:

MAGA Enraged as Quantum Computers Come Out as Non-Binary

When I went to buy a plug and receptacle the other day, the signs said, "Identifies as male", and Identifies as female".
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, berkeman and BillTre
  • #3,733
BillTre said:
From The Onion:

MAGA Enraged as Quantum Computers Come Out as Non-Binary

I couldn't find it on the Onion but it was on a reddit thread for Onion-like headlines:
 
  • #3,734
  • #3,735
zoiR4Q7kNvgH7TSGi&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-fra3-2.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Ivan Seeking, DaveC426913 and 3 others
  • #3,736
How will the recent seismic changes in Washington affect the Frequentist vs Bayesian controversy and its partisans on either side?

Any Executive Orders regarding this?
 
  • #3,737
Swamp Thing said:
How will the recent seismic changes in Washington affect the Frequentist vs Bayesian controversy and its partisans on either side?

Any Executive Orders regarding this?
I’m waiting for one that will settle the conflict between the Big-Endians and the Little-Endians (the real one about boiled eggs, not the byte-ordering tempest in a teapot).

And with tongue out of cheek again…. We do not have the bandwidth to effectively moderate a discussion that goes from humor to political so we’ll delete anything that looks like it might.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Swamp Thing and berkeman
  • #3,738
1737650437058.png
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory, collinsmark, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #3,739
1737825398196.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre, dwarde, Ibix and 1 other person
  • #3,740
What do Ken & Barbie have in common with fruitflies?

 
  • #3,741
1737850025445.png
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Likes Ibix and BillTre
  • #3,742
berkeman said:
< 3.0 to 5.0Watching table tennis
5.0 to 6.5[Doing "eye rolls" while watching table tennis
> 6.5Rapid Eye Movement (REM)
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Arjan82 and Ibix
  • #3,744
Orodruin said:
I can count to 1023 on my fingers … 🫣
59,048 if you can control the joints independently.
 
  • #3,745
Ibix said:
59,048 if you can control the joints independently.
I cannot, unfortunately. Partly a result of being a football goalkeeper in my youth. (Balls hitting fingers at unfortunate angles is nothing I recommend.)
 
  • #3,746
Ibix said:
59,048 if you can control the joints independently.
OK, I'll bite. How did you get that number?
 
  • #3,747
Tom.G said:
OK, I'll bite. How did you get that number?
I get ##10^9## if controlling each joint completely independently. 3 joints per finger except thumb, which has 2, but is opposable so that’s another degree of freedom. That means 15 joints per hand so ##2^{30}-1##.
 
  • #3,748
Tom.G said:
OK, I'll bite. How did you get that number?
If you can control the joints independently you can have your finger straight or with one or two joints folded, so three states. The number is ##3^{10}-1##.

I can do it - it's some sort of trick of lining up one joint so only the other one bends. But it's faintly uncomfortable in a way that suggests to me I'm overstressing something, so I usually stick to counting to 1023.
 
  • #3,749
Ibix said:
or with one or two joints folded
Ah, but there are three different states in each of those categories depending on which one or two joints you fold! 😉

Even if you only count two joints per finger it is 4 states depending on the joint you fold.
 
  • #3,750
Orodruin said:
I get ##10^9## if controlling each joint completely independently. 3 joints per finger except thumb, which has 2, but is opposable so that’s another degree of freedom. That means 15 joints per hand so ##2^{30}-1##.
I think I can only fold the lower joint or both, not the fully-independent flexibility required for this!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 459 ·
16
Replies
459
Views
33K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K