Schools College Decision Debate -- Purdue, Penn State or Illinois for Engineering?

AI Thread Summary
When choosing between Purdue, Penn State, and Illinois for engineering, all three schools offer strong programs with unique advantages. Purdue and Penn State have honors college options, while Illinois is still pending. Purdue's general first-year engineering program allows flexibility in choosing a specialization later, which may be beneficial for undecided students. Academic reputation among these institutions is comparable, and the quality of education largely depends on student effort and motivation rather than faculty accolades. Campus culture and personal happiness are crucial factors; visiting campuses can help gauge fit. Cost, location, and the ability to switch majors are also important considerations. Ultimately, any choice among these schools is likely to provide a solid foundation for a career in engineering.
cellist542
Messages
19
Reaction score
3
I am currently a high school senior and intend to study engineering in college next year. I am currently considering 3 schools: Purdue, Penn State, and Illinois. All three are excellent schools with solid engineering programs, and all have different benefits and drawbacks.

I was admitted to the honors colleges at Purdue and Penn State, and I am still waiting for a decision on the Illinois honors program. I was admitted for mechanical engineering at Penn State and Illinois, and Purdue has a general first year engineering program.

Does anyone have any advice on which school to choose based on how well they prepared you for your career and/or graduate school, and if there is any significant academic benefit to one school or another?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you get in-state tuition? Are there reciprocity agreements to where you are resident? These are all good schools. How much freedom do you have to switch programs at Illinois and Penn State? Penn State is in the middle of nowhere but pretty. Purdue is sort of near Chicago but really physically ugly in my opinion. Illinois somewhere in between.
Of course each school has particular strengths. How can you argue with the first and last human on luna? But Illinois is better known for physics. Tough decision but you will be well served by each institution..
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, berkeman and CalcNerd
cellist542 said:
if there is any significant academic benefit to one school or another?
Congrats on the acceptances! :smile:

Have you been able to tour any of those campuses, either in-person or virtually?
 
First, IDK. Never been to or dealt with any of those schools. But...

Academics doesn't matter that much, IMO. Those are all good schools. Trust me, your Physics prof knows more about Physics than you will ever need to learn (at this stage). Don't get hung up on things like who has a Nobel prize, they all know the material. They aren't all good educators though. You get out what you put in academically speaking; I think it has more to do with motivation and hard work on your part.

So, a huge part of motivation is "will you be happy there". Research or go visit, if you can, and ask yourself, what will I do when I'm sick of doing Physics HW and reading Dostoevsky?
 
  • Like
Likes Mondayman, Astronuc and Vanadium 50
cellist542 said:
I am currently a high school senior and intend to study engineering in college next year. I am currently considering 3 schools: Purdue, Penn State, and Illinois. All three are excellent schools with solid engineering programs, and all have different benefits and drawbacks.

I was admitted to the honors colleges at Purdue and Penn State, and I am still waiting for a decision on the Illinois honors program. I was admitted for mechanical engineering at Penn State and Illinois, and Purdue has a general first year engineering program.

Does anyone have any advice on which school to choose based on how well they prepared you for your career and/or graduate school, and if there is any significant academic benefit to one school or another?
I've worked with colleagues with various engineering degrees from all three universities, and I know some faculty members. All three are good engineering schools, so I'd point to what @DaveE mentioned, and reiterate what one gets out of an academic program depends on what one puts into it. It's a matter of one's effort and discipline.
 
You have a pleasant problem. You probably cannot go too far wrong with any of the choices. However, you stated that you intend to study "engineering" but did not say what kind of engineering you wish to study.

I take it from that lack of specificity that you have yet to select a specific field. In that case, the Purdue "general engineering" might be a good way to go. You can select the specific field when you have a better feel for what you really want to study. Note that even with in "mechanical" or "electrical" engineering there are subfields and you will eventually have to concentrate on one of those. Until you understand what is actually available you will not be in a position to make any final decisions.

In fact I recommend that you keep your options open so that you can change major fields after a year or two at the university (or even later). It is certainly possible to do that. I changed into mathermatics for a Ph.D. after getting a B.S and M.S. in electrical engineering -- but I don't really recommend waiting quite that long to make your final selection and am just illustrating how late in the game you can make a switch. Lots of physics majors switch to an engineering field for their M.S.

In terms of academic benefit any of the schools that you named will do just fine, and there is nothing much to differentiate among them unless and until you select a real specialty -- and maybe not then depending on the speciality. Also recognize that most engineers wind up doing work that is not directly related to what they studied in school -- but the general preparataion and ability to solve diverse problems that you will gain in school is invaluable and the real benefit of an engineering education.

How much you will enjoy the experience is largely a function of your relationship with your professors, and there is no good way to assess that ahead of time unless you already know them pretty well. Academic reputation will not tell you how well your style will mesh with their style -- only experience will do that.

In any case the academic reputation of people at any of those schools will be more than adequate. You can get a good undergraduate education at most schools. Faculty reputation is based on advanced research and is only a significant factor in post-graduate education. Any decent professor can do a very good job with undergraduate courses ("can" but not all "do" and there is no good way to judge that ahead of time -- and student evaluations are no help in forming a judgement).

Given all of the above you might make your selection on other factors, such as cost, the location, or just flip a coin. You can't make a really bad choice from that bunch.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and DaveE
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top