I Colliding black holes: when will linear acceleration end?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observable effects during a merger of two dissimilar black holes, particularly regarding their acceleration and the resulting event horizon. As the smaller black hole approaches the larger one, it accelerates more rapidly, leading to questions about how this acceleration might be perceived by a distant observer. The concept of a "ringdown" phase is introduced, suggesting a potential wobble in the new event horizon after the merger. Participants reference LIGO's findings, noting that detectable ringdown phases last less than 0.05 seconds post-merger. The conversation highlights the complexities of black hole interactions and the challenges in observing their effects.
gneill
Mentor
Messages
20,989
Reaction score
2,934
I was musing about black hole mergers and what an observer might see for a particularly simple (i.e. blatantly contrived) scenario.

Suppose that there are two (non rotating, un-charged, bog standard) black holes of dissimilar masses heading for a head-on collision. They will accelerate towards each other. The larger one will accelerate at a lesser rate than the smaller one, but the acceleration of both towards each other can be observed.

As they merge, will a distant observer see a change in the acceleration of the bodies, and when the smaller black hole just disappears beneath the the event horizon of the larger black hole (admittedly creating a much larger event horizon for the combined masses), will there still be a perceived acceleration of the combination for some interval? If so, for how long might this observable acceleration persist?

Just curious.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Wouldn't this manifest as a 'wobble' of the new event horizon, or a 'ringdown'?
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
Drakkith said:
Wouldn't this manifest as a 'wobble' of the new event horizon, or a 'ringdown'?
Could be. I admit that I'm not up to scratch on the details of black hole interactions. The question arose from an idle curiosity. I was wondering how long after the BH's encountered each other that the perceived accelerations of their centers of mass could be detected.

I wonder how long would a "ringdown" persist? It's kind of a sneaky way of asking how long it takes for events below the event horizon to sort themselves out if that''s even a reasonable question. Probably not.
 
gneill said:
I wonder how long would a "ringdown" persist?

According to LIGO, less than 0.05 seconds passed from peak amplitude until the ringdown was no longer detectable in the first detected black hole merger. Perhaps it lasts a bit longer but just isn't detectable from this distance.

1280px-LIGO_measurement_of_gravitational_waves.svg.png
 

Attachments

  • 1280px-LIGO_measurement_of_gravitational_waves.svg.png
    1280px-LIGO_measurement_of_gravitational_waves.svg.png
    64.6 KB · Views: 492
  • Like
Likes gneill and Klystron
Very interesting. Thanks for that!
 
  • Like
Likes Drakkith
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top