Understanding Equation Conversion: Step-by-Step Guide for Combining Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter iqbal7
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the conversion of equation A into equation B, specifically the equation Mrc= 2/3Pcb x b x 1/2d1 x 3/4d1. A user requested a step-by-step explanation of the process, which involves simplifying the multiplication of fractions and recognizing the properties of exponents. Key points include that multiplication does not require distribution and that the products of the fractions lead to a simplified form of 1/4Pcb x b x (d1)^2. The explanation provided clarified the confusion, allowing the user to understand the conversion process better. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of clear mathematical communication and the use of proper notation.
iqbal7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am reading this in a book and am having trouble understanding this.

Can someone explain the step by step the process in changing equation A into equation B?


Mrc= 2/3Pcb x b x 1/2d1 x 3/4d1

= 1/4Pcb x b x (d1)2



Many Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
iqbal7 said:
I am reading this in a book and am having trouble understanding this.

Can someone explain the step by step the process in changing equation A into equation B?


Mrc= 2/3Pcb x b x 1/2d1 x 3/4d1

= 1/4Pcb x b x (d1)2



Many Thanks


It is almost impossible to understand what you wrote (for me it is completely impossible). Please do learn how to use LaTeX within this site to write mathematics.

DonAntonio
 
It made perfect sense,

Remember that multiplication, does not require any distribution, that is, some students write

A(BC)=(AB)(AC). This is wrong. They are thinking of A(B+C)=AB+AC.

So multiplication only needs to happen once.

you have a copy of 2/3, 1/2 and 3/4. Take the first two 2/3 and 1/2, their product is 1/3.

Then 1/3 times 3/4 is 1/4. They also have two copies of d1, so that is (d1)^2.

I'm assumig by d1, you meant d_1
 
Thanks Algebrat,

You have explained it very clearly, and now I understand.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top