Combining statistics from two distributions

mclovin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to combine statistics from two distributions for the same parameter. For example I have one distribution for X from population A and a second distribution for X from population B. I want to assume all data is from the same population. I have calculated UTLs(Upper tolerance limits) for each population but need a single, combined utl for a combined population. The catch is I don't have the original data, only the calculated statistics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is that upper tolerance limit defined?
If you have some data about the distribution of the expected parameter (like mean+standard deviation and the assumption of a Gaussian distribution), you can combine both.
 
According to the summary stats it is a normal distribution and the UTL is the 95% Upper tolrance Limit. i have the range of values and the artithmetic mean. No std dev.
 
In that case, the standard deviation is just ~1/2 of the distance between mean and UTL. You can combine both values with a weighted average (the formula should be somewhere at wikipedia or on other pages. The weights are just the inverse variances.).
 
Thank you. I will follow up on this.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top