Common collector vs Common drain amplifier

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the advantages and disadvantages of common collector (CC) and common drain (CD) amplifiers, particularly in the context of their use as buffer amplifiers. Participants explore the operational characteristics, performance at different voltage levels, and the implications of using BJTs versus FETs in these configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that common drain amplifiers are preferable when using FETs, while common collector circuits are better suited for BJTs.
  • It is noted that both configurations typically exhibit slightly less than unity gain and low output impedance, making them suitable as buffer amplifiers.
  • One participant highlights the operational difference between FETs being voltage-controlled devices and BJTs being current-controlled devices.
  • Another participant claims that BJTs perform better than NMOS transistors at low voltages, specifically with a supply voltage of 5 volts.
  • Concerns are raised about the threshold voltage of FETs, which is several volts compared to only 0.65V for BJTs, affecting their performance at low input voltages.
  • There is a discussion about the complexity of biasing FETs in common drain configurations, particularly with devices like the MPF102, which requires a negative gate voltage relative to the source.
  • One participant mentions that at higher supply voltages (around 10 volts), the performance differences between CC and CD configurations may not be significant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the performance of common collector versus common drain amplifiers, particularly regarding their suitability at various voltage levels and the implications of using BJTs versus FETs. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about voltage levels, the specific characteristics of different transistor types, and the complexity of biasing in FET circuits. These factors may influence the performance and choice of amplifier configuration.

boredaxel
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what's the main advantage of choosing one over the other, besides common drain having to suffer body effect. How do we determine if a CC is better or a CD is better to use as a buffer?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You would use a common drain amplifier if you were using a FET. If you had a BJT transistor, you would use a common collector circuit.

Both have slightly less than unity gain (gain < 1 ) and low output impedance, so they are used as buffer amplifiers.
Common collector:
130px-NPN_emitter_follower.svg.png

Common drain:
180px-N-channel_JFET_source_follower.svg.png
 
The main operational difference (at least in my mind) is that FET's are Voltage controlled devices, whereas BJT's are current controlled devices.
 
With Vcc=5 volts, BJTs (common collector) work much better than NMOSs (common drain).
Bob S
 
The threshold of a FET is several volts, but only 0.65V for a bjt. If the input is 10V, the FET will output around 7V, where as the bjt will output 9.35V. For low voltages, the FET threshold is a problem. As Bob. S, stated, when the voltage is LOW, the bjt is a better choice since it drops much less voltage.

Claude
 
Last edited:
The threshold of a FET is several volts,
You wouldn't use an enhancement mode FET as a common drain amplifier. They do have a large threshold voltage.
Something like an MPF102 actually requires a negative voltage on the gate (relative to the source) to bias it.
This makes the biassing a little more complex as a large source resistor may be needed for the load but a smaller one may be needed for the biassing. So, such circuits often have both.
They have a small bypassed source resistor for bias purposes and a larger unbypassed one for the load. A gate resistor takes the voltage between the two to the gate.

However FETs perform badly at low voltages as Bob S has pointed out.
The high input impedance of an emitter follower is surprising if you haven't seen it before and it certainly becomes a voltage driven device.

If the supply voltage is 10 volts or so, which one you use doesn't make much difference to the performance.
 
vk6kro said:
[Something like an MPF102 actually requires a negative voltage on the gate (relative to the source) to bias it.
This makes the biassing a little more complex as a large source resistor may be needed for the load but a smaller one may be needed for the biassing. So, such circuits often have both.
They have a small bypassed source resistor for bias purposes and a larger unbypassed one for the load. A gate resistor takes the voltage between the two to the gate.
.
Finally getting back to the "good ol' days" of the familiar cathode bias circuits.

Bob S
 
Thanks everyone for the input!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K