Communication and electronics vs mechanical vs civil engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice of engineering majors, specifically communication and electronics engineering, mechanical engineering, and civil engineering. Participants explore job market demand, salary potential, and opportunities for management roles within these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about which engineering major to choose, focusing on job market demand and future management opportunities.
  • Another participant suggests that any of the majors have potential and emphasizes choosing based on personal interest.
  • There is a debate on whether management is an art or a science, with some arguing it should be taught as a science to avoid trends, while others insist it is inherently an art form.
  • Some participants propose that management skills can be taught and developed, countering the idea that they are innate.
  • A participant mentions that management positions in tech companies may offer salaries comparable to technical roles until higher levels are reached.
  • Concerns are raised about the suitability of pursuing engineering if the primary motivation is to become a manager, suggesting that enjoyment of the field is crucial for success.
  • Another participant recommends taking introductory courses in various engineering disciplines to determine personal interest.
  • One participant shares their experience that effective managers often come from engineering backgrounds rather than MBA programs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the nature of management and its relationship to engineering. There is no consensus on whether management is an art or a science, and views on the teachability of management skills vary. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to choosing an engineering major based on career aspirations.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of personal interest in engineering disciplines and the varying perceptions of management training. The discussion reflects differing views on the relationship between technical skills and management capabilities.

Viper20
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hello everybody,

I will Study Engineering and I'm thinking to take your opinions in the major that i will study I'm Confused between communication and electronics engineering, mechanical engineering or civil engineering.

I care about the job-market which one is the most requested ? . which one has a good salary? . which one will able me to take a management job in the future ? What is the field of ​​the work of all of them ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I studied electrical engineering. I ended up working on industrial controls.

You really can't go wrong with either of these majors. Frankly, they both have a lot of potential. Choose what you like and run with it.

As for getting into management, that depends on something that is not taught in engineering school: management psychology.

They teach MBA programs, but I hold those in very low regard. Management is one of those things that if you have to be taught how to do it from scratch, you will fail. It is an art. You can teach a lot about artistry, but you can't educate anyone to be a great artist.
 
JakeBrodskyPE said:
I studied electrical engineering. I ended up working on industrial controls.

You really can't go wrong with either of these majors. Frankly, they both have a lot of potential. Choose what you like and run with it.

As for getting into management, that depends on something that is not taught in engineering school: management psychology.

They teach MBA programs, but I hold those in very low regard. Management is one of those things that if you have to be taught how to do it from scratch, you will fail. It is an art. You can teach a lot about artistry, but you can't educate anyone to be a great artist.

I don't entirely agree with this statement, because the above statement implies that management is somehow a skill that is innate or inborn. To the contrary, management (and I'm talking about management, not about leadership) is a skill that can be, and needs to be, taught.

Now whether an MBA program can teach management skills to people from scratch is another question entirely.
 
Management is, or at least should be, taught as a science rather than art, and should be practised as such too, in order to avoid fads and fashions that arts go through.
 
Shaun_W said:
Management is, or at least should be, taught as a science rather than art, and should be practised as such too, in order to avoid fads and fashions that arts go through.

I couldn't disagree more. Management and Leadership in particular is an art. It is the art of reaching out to individuals and directing them toward a goal that everyone understands.

Management and Leadership will never be a science. The people who think that they do this like a "science" are doomed to failure. I've watched it happen over three decades in the working world. Management Science does not work. As long as we remain human, managing and leading people will be an art.
 
Viper20 said:
hello everybody,

I will Study Engineering and I'm thinking to take your opinions in the major that i will study I'm Confused between communication and electronics engineering, mechanical engineering or civil engineering.

I care about the job-market which one is the most requested ? . which one has a good salary? . which one will able me to take a management job in the future ? What is the field of ​​the work of all of them ?

If you are interested in management jobs look into jobs out of college such as GEs Edison program and BAEs ELDP program. you rotate your job every nine months and take leadership/management and technical classes
 
JakeBrodskyPE said:
I couldn't disagree more. Management and Leadership in particular is an art. It is the art of reaching out to individuals and directing them toward a goal that everyone understands.

Management and Leadership will never be a science. The people who think that they do this like a "science" are doomed to failure. I've watched it happen over three decades in the working world. Management Science does not work. As long as we remain human, managing and leading people will be an art.

I agree to a point. Some people are inherently better at leading and managing, however those are skills that can be learned and developed.
 
Viper20 said:
hello everybody,

I will Study Engineering and I'm thinking to take your opinions in the major that i will study I'm Confused between communication and electronics engineering, mechanical engineering or civil engineering.

I care about the job-market which one is the most requested ? . which one has a good salary? . which one will able me to take a management job in the future ? What is the field of ​​the work of all of them ?

If you don't mind me asking why do you want to be a manager??
If it is just for the money then you should know that at many tech companies now the pay for managers and technical positions are equal until you get to vp/director level positions.
 
If you want to be a manager you might not be all that interested in engineering. Unfortunately, engineering is challenging (especially in school) and you might not succeed if you don't enjoy it.

Also, Electrical, Mechanical, and Civil are quite different, but all valuable. Why don't you take the standard introductory courses and see if you like Circuits, Dynamics, or Statics best?
 
  • #10
StatGuy2000 said:
I don't entirely agree with this statement, because the above statement implies that management is somehow a skill that is innate or inborn. To the contrary, management (and I'm talking about management, not about leadership) is a skill that can be, and needs to be, taught.

There are various names for "a manager who can't, or won't, lead". Two of the printable ones are "administrator" and "bureaucrat".

But I sort of agree with StatGuy: you can teach almost anybody to count paperclips.
 
  • #11
The best managers I've had (and I've had some good managers) are not people with MBAs but with a decade or more of experience as design or operations engineers. Certainly none of these excellent managers went to school wondering how quickly they could get into management.

Good management is hard. I'm currently a design manager with one direct report and managing another engineer is more difficult than most other challenges I've had.
 
  • #12
JakeBrodskyPE said:
I couldn't disagree more. Management and Leadership in particular is an art. It is the art of reaching out to individuals and directing them toward a goal that everyone understands.

Management and Leadership will never be a science. The people who think that they do this like a "science" are doomed to failure. I've watched it happen over three decades in the working world. Management Science does not work. As long as we remain human, managing and leading people will be an art.

JakeBrodskyPE, I never claimed that management (nor leadership, which is different) is a science. However, what I disagree is that somehow management is an innate or inborn skill that is impossible to teach (i.e. you have to be born to be a manager), which is what you are specifically implying in your posts.

It is true that some people have an easier time to do what you are talking about -- reaching out to individuals and directing them toward an understandable goal. But this is a skill (not an art, but a skill) that can be taught and developed through practice. In this respect, management is like riding a bike or performing public speaking.

Please also note that I am dubious about the ability of most MBA programs to actually train someone to be good managers. IMHO, an MBA program's primary worth are to burnish one's resume and to build connections with fellow students or faculty.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
AlephZero said:
There are various names for "a manager who can't, or won't, lead". Two of the printable ones are "administrator" and "bureaucrat".

But I sort of agree with StatGuy: you can teach almost anybody to count paperclips.

Management is not about "counting paperclips". It's about reaching out and organizing a group of people to direct them toward common goals (as JakeBrodskyPE put it), as well as allocating the resources of the group to ensure that the goals are achievable while balancing out the costs that may be involved. These are things that can be taught or developed through practice.

Leadership goes far beyond management -- it's about presenting an overall vision for the group you work with, and motivating people to want to pursue that vision, among many other things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K