Compactness with accumulation points

  • Thread starter sazanda
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Points
In summary, the conversation discusses the proof that if every sequence in a subset K of R has an accumulation point, then K must be compact. The attempt at a solution considers using a sub-sequence and the Cauchy sequence to show that K is bounded, and therefore closed. However, the other participant suggests showing the equivalent statement that if K is not compact, there exists a sequence without an accumulation point.
  • #1
sazanda
12
0

Homework Statement



Let K be a subset of R. Prove that if every sequence in K has an accumulation point, then K must be compact.

Homework Equations



I tried to proof it below. Am I on the right track?


The Attempt at a Solution



My intuition;

Let x_n be sequence in K whose accumulation point is x, then there is a sub-sequence.
x_n_k converges to x.
Since sub-sequence x_n_k converges to x, x_n_k is a Cauchy sequence.
We know that Cauchy sequences are bounded. Thus x_n is bounded. so K is bounded.

Since all accumulation points are in K so K is closed.

By Heine-Borel Thm, K is compact.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not quite. I think you're better off showing the equivalent (each implies the other):

if K is not compact, there exists a sequence without an accumulation point.
 
  • #3
sazanda said:
x_n_k is a Cauchy sequence.
We know that Cauchy sequences are bounded. Thus x_n is bounded.
Here you appear to be saying that if a sequence has a bounded subsequence, the sequence is bounded. Consider 1/2, 2, 1/3, 3, 1/4, 4, ...
 

1. What is the definition of compactness with accumulation points?

Compactness with accumulation points is a concept in topology that describes the behavior of a set in a topological space. A set is said to be compact with accumulation points if it contains all of its limit points, meaning that it includes all the points that a sequence within the set converges to.

2. How is compactness with accumulation points related to the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem?

The Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem states that every bounded sequence in a metric space has a convergent subsequence. This theorem is closely related to compactness with accumulation points, as a set is compact with accumulation points if and only if every sequence in the set has a convergent subsequence.

3. What is the difference between compactness and compactness with accumulation points?

Compactness refers to a set that is both closed and bounded, while compactness with accumulation points refers to a set that contains all of its limit points. Therefore, all sets that are compact with accumulation points are also compact, but the converse is not necessarily true.

4. How is compactness with accumulation points used in real analysis?

In real analysis, compactness with accumulation points is often used to prove the existence and uniqueness of solutions to differential equations. It is also used in the proof of the extreme value theorem and the intermediate value theorem.

5. Can a set be compact with accumulation points but not closed?

No, a set cannot be compact with accumulation points but not closed. This is because a set that is not closed will not contain all of its limit points, contradicting the definition of compactness with accumulation points.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
572
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
966
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top