Comparing gravitational force at varying distances

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on comparing the gravitational force exerted by the sun on Halley’s Comet at its aphelion and perihelion. The gravitational force is calculated using Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, which states that force decreases with the square of the distance. It was determined that the gravitational force at aphelion is 1/8100 of that at perihelion, highlighting the significant impact of distance on gravitational attraction. The initial confusion regarding the lack of mass data was resolved by focusing on the ratio of forces rather than absolute values. This analysis illustrates the inverse-square relationship in gravitational forces effectively.
KLI897
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Halley’s Comet orbits the sun about every 75 years due to the gravitational force the sun provides. Compare the gravitational force between Halley’s Comet and the sun when the comet is at aphelion (its greatest distance from the sun) and d is about 4.5 x 10^12 m to the force at perihelion (or closest approach), where d is about 5.0 x 10^10 m.

Homework Equations


F=GmM/d^2
(Not applicable because masses aren't provided?)

The Attempt at a Solution


I wasn't sure where to begin considering the masses were not provided, but eventually I found that the distance from the sun at the furthest distance is 90x greater than when it is at its closest point. I then assumed that it wanted to me to use Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation that as the distance is doubled the force decreases by 1/4. But I'm not sure if where to go from here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KLI897 said:

Homework Statement


Halley’s Comet orbits the sun about every 75 years due to the gravitational force the sun provides. Compare the gravitational force between Halley’s Comet and the sun when the comet is at aphelion (its greatest distance from the sun) and d is about 4.5 x 10^12 m to the force at perihelion (or closest approach), where d is about 5.0 x 10^10 m.

Homework Equations


F=GmM/d^2
(Not applicable because masses aren't provided?)

The Attempt at a Solution


I wasn't sure where to begin considering the masses were not provided, but eventually I found that the distance from the sun at the furthest distance is 90x greater than when it is at its closest point. I then assumed that it wanted to me to use Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation that as the distance is doubled the force decreases by 1/4. But I'm not sure if where to go from here.
.

The problem asks the ratio of the forces, F(aphelion)/F(perihelion). Yes, use the Law of Universal Gravitation.
 
ehild said:
.

The problem asks the ratio of the forces, F(aphelion)/F(perihelion). Yes, use the Law of Universal Gravitation.
Thank you! I've concluded that the force of the sun's pull at aphelion is only 1/8100 of whatever it is at perihelion by using the inverse-square law . It was much simpler than I originally thought, I must've been over thinking it.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top