Comparing Indian High School Syllabus to MIT Lectures

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the accessibility of MIT lecture videos, particularly those by Walter Lewin, for high school students, especially from India. Participants note that many Indian students find these lectures easy to follow due to a rigorous high school curriculum that covers similar topics in greater detail. There is a consensus that these lectures are introductory and designed for a broad audience, which may include students without a strong background in physics or calculus. It is highlighted that educational systems vary globally, with some countries offering more comprehensive science education earlier on. The conversation also touches on the notion that while some students may find these lectures basic, they serve as a foundation for further learning. Overall, the introductory nature of these lectures means they are accessible to a wide range of students, regardless of their prior knowledge.
kini.Amith
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
I have seen some MIT lecture videos on you tube.i am a high school student of India and i can easily follow most of topics covered in these lectures. In fact we learn many of the topics in greater detail in high schools here in india.
Is this because the indian syllabus is rigorous or is this the case everywhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably the lectures are thought for students of a lower level or they are general introductory and students are supposed do the more rigorous stuff by themselves.
 
kini.Amith said:
I have seen some MIT lecture videos on you tube.

Watch some more before you comment. I am assuming you have seen Walter Lewin's course.

i am a high school student of India and i can easily follow most of topics covered in these lectures.

These lectures are at a very basic level.

Is this because the indian syllabus is rigorous or is this the case everywhere?

Good high school students across the globe should be able to follow these lectures. Again, I still assume you have watched Walter Lewin's series.
 
yes, i watched only walter lewin's, and i have watched many of them. Is it because they are basic that they are included on youtube?
 
I think a lot of foreigners have a more rigorous curriculim then the US. That is why I am jealous. I think most countries have students take multiple sciences starting in middle school. I am jealous I have a lot of people from India and the like and in my intro classes it was all review.

At the end of the day everyone ends up in the same spot...

Our education system sucks on the whole not all the fault lies on the teachers plenty of blame to go around
 
A bit also depends on what grade you are. If you are near the end of your high school career and have taken physics, those lectures should be on par with your knowledge. If you are a freshman, you are probably ahead of the curve. The introductory lectures are exactly that, introductory.

Moreover, in our system (as well as yours, perhaps?) physics is not mandatory. Thus, introductory physics courses do not assume any background in physics. Most don't assume any knowledge of calculus either. They just teach you the chain rule and don't do anything more complicated.

In our system, a typical high school student who has taken physics should know the stuff in the Lewin lectures. A lot of students (especially at MIT) would have had high school courses far more rigorous. But not every student has had physics. In our system, if you have had physics in high school, you can test out of the introductory lectures. And at many schools they offer an algebra based course, a calculus based course, and an honors course (aimed at physics majors with a VERY strong background).

Hope that helps!
 
kini.Amith said:
yes, i watched only walter lewin's, and i have watched many of them. Is it because they are basic that they are included on youtube?

No. For example you can see the videos of the professor Susskind. (Classical Mechanics, Relativity, etc.)
 
Back
Top