Comparing Large & Small Bodies Using Gravity & Surface Tension

AI Thread Summary
Differentiating large and small bodies in physics involves understanding the influence of gravity and surface tension, which can vary significantly based on scale. The Bond number is a relevant concept for comparing these scales, as it helps determine the dominance of gravitational versus surface tension forces. However, defining "large" and "small" is not straightforward and often depends on context, as there are no strict size thresholds. Classical physics typically applies to most scales, but quantum mechanics and relativity come into play at atomic scales and near-light speeds, respectively. Ultimately, the classification of bodies as large or small is subjective and reliant on the specific reference frame used.
nard
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Can somebody tell me how to differentiate a large scale to a small scale? I want to know what he/she is based on. What if you had to compare the scale of large and small bodies using gravity and surface tension, what would be your first move?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Bond number? I don't really understand your question.
 
I didn't refer to the bond number in my post. Suppose u have the surface tension of water maybe at normal temperature, and u are to use it to find a scale that separates large to small bodies, for you to do that u first have to know what a large scale and a small scale body is and then proceed.
 
I don't think physics is as simple as "smaller than 5 meters you use these equations, and bigger then 5 meters, you use these other equations". The equations typically require you to know the actual volume or radius or mass of the object. With that said, near atomic scales, quantum theory is used, and near the speed of light, Einstein's relativity is used, otherwise classical physics usually does just fine.
 
When i saw this question i realized that if someone asked me what a large and small body is, i wouldn't have a specific answer. I just think that large and small depend on a reference you have given yourself.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top