Pressurized containers: Stress distribution and large displacements

  • #36
Chestermiller said:
You've done it correctly so far. In a given problem, we usually don't know the relationship between dx etc. and ##dx_0## etc. yet. That's what you are solving for. So, please substitute our equations for dx and dy in terms of $$dx_0\ and\ dy_0$$ into your equation for ##(ds)^2## and express the result in the form $$(ds)^2=A(dx_0)^2+B(dy_0)^2+Cdx_0dy_0$$. What do you get for A, B, and C?
All right. It's good to know I'm still on track. I have to say though that I don't know where those tracks lead to yet but I'll keep going.
First:
$$dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
Then:
$$dx^2=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy^2=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
By the way, I assume the squares mean just that. Something ##\times## itself. It's NOT the second derivative.
Finally:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2$$
Where:
$$dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
You can see the values of ##A##, ##B##, and ##C## you requested at post #34 in that last equation. They might be wrong or there could be a typo but that's what I got.

Chestermiller said:
Well, I'm trying to lead you through how we would approach large deformation mechanics.
And for that, I'm very grateful.

Chestermiller said:
I understand. Even linear strains and displacements together with linear relation for the stress tensor isn't that easy. You need to at least have some familiarity with 2nd order tensors and how to apply them. For large displacements and strains, things are much more complicated. Try Googling "large displacement mechanics" or "large displacement mechanics." Or hit the Continuum Mechanics literature.
In university, I wasn't taught continuum mechanics in much depth. Besides, I'm somewhat rusty so the little I learned is fuzzy in my head. However, it feels like a very necessary field to know as an engineer and I also find it especially interesting so here we are.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Juanda said:
All right. It's good to know I'm still on track. I have to say though that I don't know where those tracks lead to yet but I'll keep going.
First:
$$dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
Then:
$$dx^2=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy^2=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
By the way, I assume the squares mean just that. Something ##\times## itself. It's NOT the second derivative.
Finally:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2$$
Where:
$$dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
Excellent. Next, let ##x=x_0+u## and ##y=y_0+v##, where u and v are the displacements of the material points (functions of the coordinates ##x_0## and ##y_0##). What do you get if you substitute these into the right hand side of the equation?
 
  • #38
Chestermiller said:
Excellent. Next, let ##x=x_0+u## and ##y=y_0+v##, where u and v are the displacements of the material points (functions of the coordinates ##x_0## and ##y_0##). What do you get if you substitute these into the right hand side of the equation?
Do you mean doing this?

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$

Then do it to all the terms and see what comes out. I just want to make sure that's the goal before working on it.
 
  • #39
Juanda said:
Do you mean doing this?

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$

Then do it to all the terms and see what comes out. I just want to make sure that's the goal before working on it.
Yes, exactly.
 
  • #40
Chestermiller said:
Yes, exactly.

Ok. I'll do a little recap because it's been a while since I could get to this.
We come from this expression that represents the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened (post #32 for sketch).

$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

Then, introducing the displacement field we get:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

As a result, ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## can be expressed in terms of the displacement field. For that, I'll state some intermediate equations to keep track of.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$

I'm not sure if we can say ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=0## because the original vertical position of the point does not depend on the original horizontal position of the point. For now I'll leave it as shown without assuming it's zero.

The two remaining relevant equations are:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$

Before I keep going, can we confirm if ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}=0## is true or not? The reasoning of non-dependence seems logical but I lack the background to really know if it makes sense or not.
 
  • #41
Juanda said:
Ok. I'll do a little recap because it's been a while since I could get to this.
We come from this expression that represents the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened (post #32 for sketch).

$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

Then, introducing the displacement field we get:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

As a result, ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## can be expressed in terms of the displacement field. For that, I'll state some intermediate equations to keep track of.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$

I'm not sure if we can say ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=0## because the original vertical position of the point does not depend on the original horizontal position of the point. For now I'll leave it as shown without assuming it's zero.

The two remaining relevant equations are:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$

Before I keep going, can we confirm if ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}=0## is true or not? The reasoning of non-dependence seems logical but I lack the background to really know if it makes sense or not.
Of course. Both are independent variables.
 
  • #42
Chestermiller said:
Of course. Both are independent variables.
All right. That simplifies things a little bit. I'll continue.

The objective is to express the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

In terms of the displacement field:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

Introducing some intermediate equations so the final result doesn't seem like it came out of nowhere:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2$$

Finally, plugging all that in the expression for ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## yields the following:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2=(1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2
+(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2
+2((1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}))+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}))dx_0dy_0$$

After all that I feel I am just as lost as I was at the beginning if not more. Is there anything I should be able to see in that expression? All I see is it's very long and I don't know what else to do with it.
 
  • #43
Juanda said:
All right. That simplifies things a little bit. I'll continue.

The objective is to express the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

In terms of the displacement field:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

Introducing some intermediate equations so the final result doesn't seem like it came out of nowhere:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2$$

Finally, plugging all that in the expression for ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## yields the following:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2=(1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2
+(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2
+2((1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}))+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}))dx_0dy_0$$

After all that I feel I am just as lost as I was at the beginning if not more. Is there anything I should be able to see in that expression? All I see is it's very long and I don't know what else to do with it.
We’re not done yet. Please be patient. I’ll be back later.
 
  • Like
Likes Juanda
  • #44
Let $$\frac{dx_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dx_0}{ds_0}=\cos{\alpha}$$and $$\frac{dy_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dy_0}{ds_0}=\sin{\alpha}$$such that ##\alpha## defines the direction of the arbitrary differential position vector between the two neighboring material points in the undeformed configuration. Then show that the stretching between the material points can be expressed in the form $$\lambda^2=(\frac{ds}{ds_0})^2=(\lambda_x)^2\cos^2{\alpha}+(\lambda_y)^2\sin^2{\alpha}+4\epsilon_{xy}\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$From the previous development, what are the expressions for ##\lambda^2_x##, ## \lambda^2_y##, and ##\epsilon_{xy}##?
 
  • #45
Let me first add the first two equations to the drawing I made before to make sure I'm still following you.
Is this correct?
1696404118038.png
 
  • #46
Juanda said:
Let me first add the first two equations to the drawing I made before to make sure I'm still following you.
Is this correct?
View attachment 332983
yes
 
  • #47
So I've been trying for a few days and I simply don't know how to approach it.
I think this is as far as I can get. I'm glad I could at least get the first question but the second one just feels too hard for me to crack.
 
  • #48
Juanda said:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 =dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2$$$$+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
Dividing this equation by ##(ds_0)^2=(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2## gives $$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

OK so far?
 
  • #49
Chestermiller said:
Dividing this equation by ##(ds_0)^2=(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2## gives $$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

OK so far?

Just to be sure.

FROM
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 =dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2$$

AND
$$\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2 =dx_0^2+dy_0^2$$

If I simply combine both doing
$$\lambda^2=\frac{\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2}{\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2}$$

In the end, it reduces to
$$\lambda^2=\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$

With
$$\frac{dx_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dx_0}{ds_0}=\cos{\alpha}$$
$$\frac{dy_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dy_0}{ds_0}=\sin{\alpha}$$

Is that how it is? It's a hard blow to realize I missed it and I just needed to keep pressing to reduce the expression algebraically although even after looking at the final expression I can't really see how it simplified all the way down to the final expression you showed.
I was focusing on the displacement field because it's the last part we focused on so I didn't think of using the previous expressions. I actually think I could have gotten to a somewhat equivalent point using the expression of the displacement field and I just got lost in the swarm of letters I was trying to deal with.
 
  • #50
Juanda said:
Just to be sure.

FROM
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 =dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2$$

AND
$$\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2 =dx_0^2+dy_0^2$$

If I simply combine both doing
$$\lambda^2=\frac{\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2}{\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2}$$

In the end, it reduces to
$$\lambda^2=\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$

With
$$\frac{dx_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dx_0}{ds_0}=\cos{\alpha}$$
$$\frac{dy_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dy_0}{ds_0}=\sin{\alpha}$$

Is that how it is?
You're missing the ##dx_0dy_0## term.
Juanda said:
It's a hard blow to realize I missed it and I just needed to keep pressing to reduce the expression algebraically although even after looking at the final expression I can't really see how it simplified all the way down to the final expression you showed.
I was focusing on the displacement field because it's the last part we focused on so I didn't think of using the previous expressions. I actually think I could have gotten to a somewhat equivalent point using the expression of the displacement field and I just got lost in the swarm of letters I was trying to deal with.
That's OK. I didn't now what I wanted to introduce first.

What do you get if you now convert to the displacements?
 
  • #51
Chestermiller said:
You're missing the ##dx_0dy_0## term.
You're totally right. I right-clicked to copy and I didn't realize they'd been separated into two equations so they are shown as two lines. That's probably de best option to make lengthy equations easy to read in the forum. I'll try to follow the same method from now on.

Chestermiller said:
What do you get if you now convert to the displacements?
I'll try to work it out today when I find the spot to sit on it a little longer. It'd be a matter of substitution which is manageable to me. Maybe a typo here and there but a straightforward process overall.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
  • #52
Using post #42 I came to the following expression.
$$
\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}
$$

By the way, I caught a typo on post #42 but I can't edit it out now. I mixed the differentials here.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$
 
  • #53
Juanda said:
Using post #42 I came to the following expression.
$$
\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}
$$
What happened to the sin cos term?
Juanda said:
By the way, I caught a typo on post #42 but I can't edit it out now. I mixed the differentials here.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$
I think this equation has a typo.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2$$
After you make these corrections, I'll tell you what to do in the next step.
 
  • #54
Juanda said:
Using post #42 I came to the following expression.
$$
\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}
$$

By the way, I caught a typo on post #42 but I can't edit it out now. I mixed the differentials here.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$
Why can’t you edit it?
 
  • #55
Chestermiller said:
What happened to the sin cos term?
I'm not sure what you mean. They are there. I made the substitution and that's the expression I got.

Chestermiller said:
I think this equation has a typo.
Yes, that's the typo I was pointing at from #42. I probably could have expressed it more clearly. I should have done something like this (italic):

I found a typo at #42.
Juanda said:
From #42:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

I mixed the differentials while copying and pasting previous expressions. It'd have been:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2$$


That typo shouldn't have affected the expression for the strain ratio from #52 because I corrected it.

Chestermiller said:
Why can’t you edit it?
After some time goes by, editing a message is no longer possible at least for me. You might have more options available due to your status in the forum.
 
  • #56
Juanda said:
I'm not sure what you mean. They are there. I made the substitution and that's the expression I got.
I meant this term:
$$+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
Yes, about editing. I've been granted extended privileges for editing.
 
  • #57
Chestermiller said:
I meant this term:
$$+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
My bad. I connected and disconnected from this problem too many times and I lost track. You already pointed out that I was missing that term and I acknowledged it just to forget it again.
The original expression you showed is:
$$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Expressed in terms of the displacement field it'd be:
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

I hope it's OK now. No typos, no forgotten terms, etc. Let me know if I missed anything else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
  • #58
Juanda said:
My bad. I connected and disconnected from this problem too many times and I lost track. You already pointed out that I was missing that term and I acknowledged it just to forget it again.
The original expression you showed is:
$$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Expressed in terms of the displacement field it'd be:
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

I hope it's OK now. No typos, no forgotten terms, etc. Let me know if I missed anything else.
Now, let the strain in the material line joining the two material points be defined as $$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$ What do you get?
 
  • #59
Chestermiller said:
Now, let the strain in the material line joining the two material points be defined as $$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$ What do you get?
The expression for ##\lambda^2## is already known.
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

So it'd be just plugging it in ##\epsilon##.
$$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$
$$\epsilon=\frac{\left ( \left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}\right )-1}{2}$$
 
  • #60
Juanda said:
The expression for ##\lambda^2## is already known.
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

So it'd be just plugging it in ##\epsilon##.
$$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$
$$\epsilon=\frac{\left ( \left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}\right )-1}{2}$$
make use of cos^2+sin^2 = 1 please
 
  • #61
Chestermiller said:
make use of cos^2+sin^2 = 1 please
But ##J \neq D##. How could I use it?
$$\lambda^2=\overbrace{\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]}^J\cos^2{\alpha}+
\overbrace{\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]}^D
\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$
 
  • #62
$$\lambda^2=1+\overbrace{\left[2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]}^J\cos^2{\alpha}+
\overbrace{\left[2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]}^D
\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$
 
  • #63
Chestermiller said:
$$\lambda^2=1+\overbrace{\left[2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]}^J\cos^2{\alpha}+
\overbrace{\left[2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]}^D
\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$
Oh. Yeah. That first ##1## could multiply on both terms and then be simplified.
But is the resulting expression any better? If there is something I should recognize from looking at it I'm failing to do so.
 
  • #64
Juanda said:
Oh. Yeah. That first ##1## could multiply on both terms and then be simplified.
But is the resulting expression any better? If there is something I should recognize from looking at it I'm failing to do so.
Not yet. Please next give the equation of the strain ##\epsilon ## that I asked for. We're almost there.
 
  • #65
Chestermiller said:
Not yet. Please next give the equation of the strain ##\epsilon ## that I asked for. We're almost there.
All right.

Strain is:
$$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$

And ##\lambda^2## is:
$$\lambda^2=1+\left[2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Plugging that ##\lambda^2## in the strain will result in the ##1## canceling and also the ##2## from the third term so it'll be:
$$\frac{\left[2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}}{2}$$
$$+\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Is this the expression you're looking for?
 
  • #66
Juanda said:
All right.

Strain is:
$$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$

And ##\lambda^2## is:
$$\lambda^2=1+\left[2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Plugging that ##\lambda^2## in the strain will result in the ##1## canceling and also the ##2## from the third term so it'll be:
$$\frac{\left[2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}}{2}$$
$$+\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Is this the expression you're looking for?
Basically, yes. But, consider this. $$\epsilon=\epsilon_{xx}\cos^2{\alpha}+\epsilon_{yy}\sin^2{\alpha}+\epsilon_{xy}\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}+\epsilon_{yx}\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$where $$\epsilon_{xx}=\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]$$

$$\epsilon_{yy}=\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]$$

$$\epsilon_{xy}=\epsilon_{yx}=\frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0} \right]$$
So you recognize the small displacement strain terns in these equations?
 
  • #67
I'm not sure what you mean. I do see some similarities but I'm not sure what I should understand from that.

1698089668843.png
 
  • #68
Juanda said:
I'm not sure what you mean. I do see some similarities but I'm not sure what I should understand from that.

View attachment 334073
What does your Strength ofMaterials book or Theory of Elasticity book or Wikipedia give for the components of the infinitesimal (linear) strain tensor?
 
  • #69
Chestermiller said:
What does your Strength ofMaterials book or Theory of Elasticity book or Wikipedia give for the components of the infinitesimal (linear) strain tensor?

Are you referring to how 2nd order terms are typically ignored if they're very small compared with 1st order terms?

From Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinitesimal_strain_theory
1698090113445.png


After doing the math and ignoring what's going on with the 3rd dimension so that it looks as the simplification developed in this thread, the infinitesimal strain tensor is as shown.
1698090715080.png
Is this what you meant?
 
  • #70
Juanda said:
Are you referring to how 2nd order terms are typically ignored if they're very small compared with 1st order terms?

From Wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinitesimal_strain_theory
View attachment 334074

After doing the math and ignoring what's going on with the 3rd dimension so that it looks as the simplification developed in this thread, the infinitesimal strain tensor is as shown.
View attachment 334075Is this what you meant?
Yes, these are the small displacement (linear) terms in the strains. If you had also included the z direction, those strains would also be also be properly accounted for too by this methodology. By the methodology, I mean using ##\frac{(\lambda^2-1)}{2}## as a vehicle to elucidate the strains in terms of the displacements.

These equations could also be used (the full expressions for the strains including the non-linear terms) if the displacements are large but the strains are small (e.g., for a very stiff material). Under such circumstances, the 3D Hooke's law equations could still be used. However, if the displacements and the strains are also large, Hooke's law could not be used, since it is only valid for small strains. That is when wee enter the realm of non-linear elasticity and more complex material behavior.
 
  • Informative
Likes Juanda

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
862
Replies
10
Views
781
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Back
Top