Pressurized containers: Stress distribution and large displacements

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Juanda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics of materials
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the analysis of stress distribution and large displacements in pressurized spherical containers. The participants explore deriving stress distribution without assuming constant thickness and the implications of large displacements on stress and strain calculations. Key equations discussed include the stress equilibrium equation and the relationship between principal stresses and strains in spherical coordinates. The conversation emphasizes the need for a comprehensive understanding of the strain-displacement equations and boundary conditions to solve for stress and strain states within thick spherical shells.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mechanics of Materials, specifically stress and strain concepts.
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates and their application in stress analysis.
  • Knowledge of linear elasticity, including Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio.
  • Proficiency in solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) related to mechanical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of stress distribution in non-uniform thickness scenarios for pressurized vessels.
  • Learn about the application of the stress equilibrium equation in spherical coordinates.
  • Research the relationship between principal stresses and strains in the context of large deformations.
  • Explore numerical methods for solving second-order ordinary differential equations in mechanical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, structural analysts, and students studying pressure vessel design and analysis, particularly those interested in advanced topics of stress distribution and deformation in pressurized containers.

  • #31
Juanda said:
To be honest I don't remember being taught about stretch ratios while I was in university. It might be a language issue. It's not that I don't understand it. I checked the formula and I know what it is.
Simply I think we don't have a specific word to define that. It could also be I simply don't remember the name though. We just used forces, stress, strain, and displacements. I actually don't see much added value in incorporating the stretch ratio into the mix of variables that already seem to fully define the situation but my conception might change as I learn more.
In fact, I thought you swapped from ##\epsilon## to ##\lambda## to indicate we're tackling question 2 about the balloon instead of question 1 about the tank.Yeah, after noticing the difference between strain and stretch ratio I see how it makes sense.I guess that'd be a reason to try using stress ratio instead of strain.
For large deformation situations, the stretch ratio is not ambiguous,, but the strain is.
Juanda said:
Wouldn't I need to know the functions for ##x##; ##y##; ##z## to be able to answer that question?
For example,
$$x=x_0+1$$
So every point moves 1 unit to the right. Now I can check where that neighboring point you described would end up by inputting that into the previous expression.
$$x=x_0+dx_0+1$$
Is that what you meant with your question?
No. I already specified the functionality: ##x=x(x_0,y_0,z_0)##, same for y and z. So, $$dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial z_0}dz_0$$same for dy and dz.

Let ##(ds)^2## be the square of distance between the two closely neighboring material points in the deformed configuration of the body. Please express ##(ds)^2## in terms of ##dx_0, \ dy_0,\ and\ dz_0## (not dx, dy and dz). That is, in terms of the differential differences of the coordinates of the two material points in the undeformed configuration of the body.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I'm trying to visualize what you're asking for. Let me drop the ##z## component so that's simpler to draw.
We have the points ##A## and ##B##.
Before the deformation, their positions are ##A_0## and ##B_0## and after the deformation, they are ##A## and ##B##. After the deformation, they are very close.
1694270433834.png


From the diagram, I can express ##ds## in terms of ##A## and ##B## but that will result in an expression dependent of ##dx## and ##dy##.
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2$$
Where ##dx## and ##dy## can be obtained from what you shared:
$$dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$

I doubt that's the expression of ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## you're looking for because there still are ##\partial x## in it.
I'm not sure I'm prepared to understand question 2.
I'm already thankful for at least being able to follow you through question 1 (the tank with small deformations without assuming constant stress in the shell) but question 2 (the balloon with big deformations) seems orders of magnitude more complex.
It's not my intention to waste your time so if I'm still far off what're trying to transmit I think it'll be better if I just keep reading books before trying to tackle something like this.
 
  • #33
Juanda said:
It's not my intention to waste your time so if I'm still far off what're trying to transmit I think it'll be better if I just keep reading books before trying to tackle something like this.
I'm answering just to make sure the message goes through as I understand it.
When I say "far off" I don't mean that there's still a lot to go. I can keep going without issues.
What I was trying to say is that if you realize I just lack a strong enough base to understand this now then I won't waste more of your time and I'll focus on easier problems before trying to deal with something like this for which I'm not yet ready.
 
  • #34
Juanda said:
I'm trying to visualize what you're asking for. Let me drop the ##z## component so that's simpler to draw.
We have the points ##A## and ##B##.
Before the deformation, their positions are ##A_0## and ##B_0## and after the deformation, they are ##A## and ##B##. After the deformation, they are very close.
View attachment 331716

From the diagram, I can express ##ds## in terms of ##A## and ##B## but that will result in an expression dependent of ##dx## and ##dy##.
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2$$
Where ##dx## and ##dy## can be obtained from what you shared:
$$dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$

I doubt that's the expression of ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## you're looking for because there still are ##\partial x## in it.

You've done it correctly so far. In a given problem, we usually don't know the relationship between dx etc. and ##dx_0## etc. yet. That's what you are solving for. So, please substitute our equations for dx and dy in terms of $$dx_0\ and\ dy_0$$ into your equation for ##(ds)^2## and express the result in the form $$(ds)^2=A(dx_0)^2+B(dy_0)^2+Cdx_0dy_0$$. What do you get for A, B, and C?
Juanda said:
I'm not sure I'm prepared to understand question 2.
I'm already thankful for at least being able to follow you through question 1 (the tank with small deformations without assuming constant stress in the shell) but question 2 (the balloon with big deformations) seems orders of magnitude more complex.
It's not my intention to waste your time so if I'm still far off what're trying to transmit I think it'll be better if I just keep reading books before trying to tackle something like this.
Well, I'm trying to lead you through how we would approach large deformation mechanics. The first step is to establish the displacement-strain equations for large displacements.
 
  • #35
Juanda said:
I'm answering just to make sure the message goes through as I understand it.
When I say "far off" I don't mean that there's still a lot to go. I can keep going without issues.
What I was trying to say is that if you realize I just lack a strong enough base to understand this now then I won't waste more of your time and I'll focus on easier problems before trying to deal with something like this for which I'm not yet ready.
I understand. Even linear strains and displacements together with linear relation for the stress tensor isn't that easy. You need to at least have some familiarity with 2nd order tensors and how to apply them. For large displacements and strains, things are much more complicated. Try Googling "large displacement mechanics" or "large displacement mechanics." Or hit the Continuum Mechanics literature.
 
  • #36
Chestermiller said:
You've done it correctly so far. In a given problem, we usually don't know the relationship between dx etc. and ##dx_0## etc. yet. That's what you are solving for. So, please substitute our equations for dx and dy in terms of $$dx_0\ and\ dy_0$$ into your equation for ##(ds)^2## and express the result in the form $$(ds)^2=A(dx_0)^2+B(dy_0)^2+Cdx_0dy_0$$. What do you get for A, B, and C?
All right. It's good to know I'm still on track. I have to say though that I don't know where those tracks lead to yet but I'll keep going.
First:
$$dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
Then:
$$dx^2=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy^2=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
By the way, I assume the squares mean just that. Something ##\times## itself. It's NOT the second derivative.
Finally:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2$$
Where:
$$dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
You can see the values of ##A##, ##B##, and ##C## you requested at post #34 in that last equation. They might be wrong or there could be a typo but that's what I got.

Chestermiller said:
Well, I'm trying to lead you through how we would approach large deformation mechanics.
And for that, I'm very grateful.

Chestermiller said:
I understand. Even linear strains and displacements together with linear relation for the stress tensor isn't that easy. You need to at least have some familiarity with 2nd order tensors and how to apply them. For large displacements and strains, things are much more complicated. Try Googling "large displacement mechanics" or "large displacement mechanics." Or hit the Continuum Mechanics literature.
In university, I wasn't taught continuum mechanics in much depth. Besides, I'm somewhat rusty so the little I learned is fuzzy in my head. However, it feels like a very necessary field to know as an engineer and I also find it especially interesting so here we are.
 
  • #37
Juanda said:
All right. It's good to know I'm still on track. I have to say though that I don't know where those tracks lead to yet but I'll keep going.
First:
$$dx=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
Then:
$$dx^2=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
$$dy^2=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2dx_0^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2dy_0^2+2\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}dx_0\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}dy_0$$
By the way, I assume the squares mean just that. Something ##\times## itself. It's NOT the second derivative.
Finally:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2$$
Where:
$$dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
Excellent. Next, let ##x=x_0+u## and ##y=y_0+v##, where u and v are the displacements of the material points (functions of the coordinates ##x_0## and ##y_0##). What do you get if you substitute these into the right hand side of the equation?
 
  • #38
Chestermiller said:
Excellent. Next, let ##x=x_0+u## and ##y=y_0+v##, where u and v are the displacements of the material points (functions of the coordinates ##x_0## and ##y_0##). What do you get if you substitute these into the right hand side of the equation?
Do you mean doing this?

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$

Then do it to all the terms and see what comes out. I just want to make sure that's the goal before working on it.
 
  • #39
Juanda said:
Do you mean doing this?

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$

Then do it to all the terms and see what comes out. I just want to make sure that's the goal before working on it.
Yes, exactly.
 
  • #40
Chestermiller said:
Yes, exactly.

Ok. I'll do a little recap because it's been a while since I could get to this.
We come from this expression that represents the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened (post #32 for sketch).

$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

Then, introducing the displacement field we get:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

As a result, ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## can be expressed in terms of the displacement field. For that, I'll state some intermediate equations to keep track of.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$

I'm not sure if we can say ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=0## because the original vertical position of the point does not depend on the original horizontal position of the point. For now I'll leave it as shown without assuming it's zero.

The two remaining relevant equations are:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$

Before I keep going, can we confirm if ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}=0## is true or not? The reasoning of non-dependence seems logical but I lack the background to really know if it makes sense or not.
 
  • #41
Juanda said:
Ok. I'll do a little recap because it's been a while since I could get to this.
We come from this expression that represents the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened (post #32 for sketch).

$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

Then, introducing the displacement field we get:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

As a result, ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## can be expressed in terms of the displacement field. For that, I'll state some intermediate equations to keep track of.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$

I'm not sure if we can say ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=0## because the original vertical position of the point does not depend on the original horizontal position of the point. For now I'll leave it as shown without assuming it's zero.

The two remaining relevant equations are:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$

Before I keep going, can we confirm if ##\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}=0## is true or not? The reasoning of non-dependence seems logical but I lack the background to really know if it makes sense or not.
Of course. Both are independent variables.
 
  • #42
Chestermiller said:
Of course. Both are independent variables.
All right. That simplifies things a little bit. I'll continue.

The objective is to express the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

In terms of the displacement field:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

Introducing some intermediate equations so the final result doesn't seem like it came out of nowhere:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2$$

Finally, plugging all that in the expression for ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## yields the following:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2=(1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2
+(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2
+2((1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}))+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}))dx_0dy_0$$

After all that I feel I am just as lost as I was at the beginning if not more. Is there anything I should be able to see in that expression? All I see is it's very long and I don't know what else to do with it.
 
  • #43
Juanda said:
All right. That simplifies things a little bit. I'll continue.

The objective is to express the distance from 2 points that were originally very close to each other before the deformation happened:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 = \left \| \vec{B}-\vec{A} \right \|^2=\left \| (dx,dy) \right \|^2=dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$

In terms of the displacement field:
$$x=x_0+u$$
$$y=y_0+v$$

Introducing some intermediate equations so the final result doesn't seem like it came out of nowhere:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial x_0}=1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial y_0}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (y_0+v)}{\partial y_0}=1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2=(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})^2=1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2$$

Finally, plugging all that in the expression for ##\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2## yields the following:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2=(1+2\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2
+(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2+1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2
+2((1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}))+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}))dx_0dy_0$$

After all that I feel I am just as lost as I was at the beginning if not more. Is there anything I should be able to see in that expression? All I see is it's very long and I don't know what else to do with it.
We’re not done yet. Please be patient. I’ll be back later.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juanda
  • #44
Let $$\frac{dx_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dx_0}{ds_0}=\cos{\alpha}$$and $$\frac{dy_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dy_0}{ds_0}=\sin{\alpha}$$such that ##\alpha## defines the direction of the arbitrary differential position vector between the two neighboring material points in the undeformed configuration. Then show that the stretching between the material points can be expressed in the form $$\lambda^2=(\frac{ds}{ds_0})^2=(\lambda_x)^2\cos^2{\alpha}+(\lambda_y)^2\sin^2{\alpha}+4\epsilon_{xy}\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$From the previous development, what are the expressions for ##\lambda^2_x##, ## \lambda^2_y##, and ##\epsilon_{xy}##?
 
  • #45
Let me first add the first two equations to the drawing I made before to make sure I'm still following you.
Is this correct?
1696404118038.png
 
  • #46
Juanda said:
Let me first add the first two equations to the drawing I made before to make sure I'm still following you.
Is this correct?
View attachment 332983
yes
 
  • #47
So I've been trying for a few days and I simply don't know how to approach it.
I think this is as far as I can get. I'm glad I could at least get the first question but the second one just feels too hard for me to crack.
 
  • #48
Juanda said:
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 =dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2$$$$+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
Dividing this equation by ##(ds_0)^2=(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2## gives $$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

OK so far?
 
  • #49
Chestermiller said:
Dividing this equation by ##(ds_0)^2=(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2## gives $$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

OK so far?

Just to be sure.

FROM
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 =dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2$$

AND
$$\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2 =dx_0^2+dy_0^2$$

If I simply combine both doing
$$\lambda^2=\frac{\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2}{\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2}$$

In the end, it reduces to
$$\lambda^2=\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$

With
$$\frac{dx_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dx_0}{ds_0}=\cos{\alpha}$$
$$\frac{dy_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dy_0}{ds_0}=\sin{\alpha}$$

Is that how it is? It's a hard blow to realize I missed it and I just needed to keep pressing to reduce the expression algebraically although even after looking at the final expression I can't really see how it simplified all the way down to the final expression you showed.
I was focusing on the displacement field because it's the last part we focused on so I didn't think of using the previous expressions. I actually think I could have gotten to a somewhat equivalent point using the expression of the displacement field and I just got lost in the swarm of letters I was trying to deal with.
 
  • #50
Juanda said:
Just to be sure.

FROM
$$\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2 =dx^2+dy^2=(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}^2)dx_0^2+(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}^2)dy_0^2$$

AND
$$\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2 =dx_0^2+dy_0^2$$

If I simply combine both doing
$$\lambda^2=\frac{\left \| d\vec{s} \right \|^2}{\left \| d\vec{s_0} \right \|^2}$$

In the end, it reduces to
$$\lambda^2=\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$

With
$$\frac{dx_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dx_0}{ds_0}=\cos{\alpha}$$
$$\frac{dy_0}{\sqrt{(dx_0)^2+(dy_0)^2}}=\frac{dy_0}{ds_0}=\sin{\alpha}$$

Is that how it is?
You're missing the ##dx_0dy_0## term.
Juanda said:
It's a hard blow to realize I missed it and I just needed to keep pressing to reduce the expression algebraically although even after looking at the final expression I can't really see how it simplified all the way down to the final expression you showed.
I was focusing on the displacement field because it's the last part we focused on so I didn't think of using the previous expressions. I actually think I could have gotten to a somewhat equivalent point using the expression of the displacement field and I just got lost in the swarm of letters I was trying to deal with.
That's OK. I didn't now what I wanted to introduce first.

What do you get if you now convert to the displacements?
 
  • #51
Chestermiller said:
You're missing the ##dx_0dy_0## term.
You're totally right. I right-clicked to copy and I didn't realize they'd been separated into two equations so they are shown as two lines. That's probably de best option to make lengthy equations easy to read in the forum. I'll try to follow the same method from now on.

Chestermiller said:
What do you get if you now convert to the displacements?
I'll try to work it out today when I find the spot to sit on it a little longer. It'd be a matter of substitution which is manageable to me. Maybe a typo here and there but a straightforward process overall.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
  • #52
Using post #42 I came to the following expression.
$$
\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}
$$

By the way, I caught a typo on post #42 but I can't edit it out now. I mixed the differentials here.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$
 
  • #53
Juanda said:
Using post #42 I came to the following expression.
$$
\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}
$$
What happened to the sin cos term?
Juanda said:
By the way, I caught a typo on post #42 but I can't edit it out now. I mixed the differentials here.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$
I think this equation has a typo.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2$$
After you make these corrections, I'll tell you what to do in the next step.
 
  • #54
Juanda said:
Using post #42 I came to the following expression.
$$
\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}
$$

By the way, I caught a typo on post #42 but I can't edit it out now. I mixed the differentials here.
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$
Why can’t you edit it?
 
  • #55
Chestermiller said:
What happened to the sin cos term?
I'm not sure what you mean. They are there. I made the substitution and that's the expression I got.

Chestermiller said:
I think this equation has a typo.
Yes, that's the typo I was pointing at from #42. I probably could have expressed it more clearly. I should have done something like this (italic):

I found a typo at #42.
Juanda said:
From #42:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2$$

I mixed the differentials while copying and pasting previous expressions. It'd have been:
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial (x_0+u)}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial x_0}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}=\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}$$
$$\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}^2=\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2$$


That typo shouldn't have affected the expression for the strain ratio from #52 because I corrected it.

Chestermiller said:
Why can’t you edit it?
After some time goes by, editing a message is no longer possible at least for me. You might have more options available due to your status in the forum.
 
  • #56
Juanda said:
I'm not sure what you mean. They are there. I made the substitution and that's the expression I got.
I meant this term:
$$+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
Yes, about editing. I've been granted extended privileges for editing.
 
  • #57
Chestermiller said:
I meant this term:
$$+2(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0})dx_0dy_0$$
My bad. I connected and disconnected from this problem too many times and I lost track. You already pointed out that I was missing that term and I acknowledged it just to forget it again.
The original expression you showed is:
$$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Expressed in terms of the displacement field it'd be:
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

I hope it's OK now. No typos, no forgotten terms, etc. Let me know if I missed anything else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller
  • #58
Juanda said:
My bad. I connected and disconnected from this problem too many times and I lost track. You already pointed out that I was missing that term and I acknowledged it just to forget it again.
The original expression you showed is:
$$\frac{(ds)^2}{(ds_0)^2}=\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\right)^2\right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[\left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}\right)^2+\left(\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right)^2\right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[\frac{\partial x}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial x}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial x_0}\frac{\partial y}{\partial y_0}\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

Expressed in terms of the displacement field it'd be:
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

I hope it's OK now. No typos, no forgotten terms, etc. Let me know if I missed anything else.
Now, let the strain in the material line joining the two material points be defined as $$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$ What do you get?
 
  • #59
Chestermiller said:
Now, let the strain in the material line joining the two material points be defined as $$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$ What do you get?
The expression for ##\lambda^2## is already known.
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

So it'd be just plugging it in ##\epsilon##.
$$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$
$$\epsilon=\frac{\left ( \left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}\right )-1}{2}$$
 
  • #60
Juanda said:
The expression for ##\lambda^2## is already known.
$$\lambda^2=\left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}$$
$$+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}$$

So it'd be just plugging it in ##\epsilon##.
$$\epsilon=\frac{\lambda^2-1}{2}$$
$$\epsilon=\frac{\left ( \left[1 +2 \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0}^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0}^2 \right]\cos^2{\alpha}+\left[1+2\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0}^2 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0}^2 \right]\sin^2{\alpha}+2\left[(1+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_0})(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y_0})+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x_0})(1+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y_0})\right]\sin{\alpha}\cos{\alpha}\right )-1}{2}$$
make use of cos^2+sin^2 = 1 please
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K