Courses Comparing Physics & Math in First Two Year Courses

AI Thread Summary
Upper division physics courses are generally seen as building on the foundational knowledge acquired in the first two years of study, with a greater emphasis on applying mathematical concepts to physical situations. Students report that while the material can be more challenging, it often resembles earlier courses in terms of structure, with some courses focusing more on mathematical rigor, like Electromagnetism, and others emphasizing conceptual understanding, like Mechanics. A key takeaway is the importance of retaining problem-solving strategies and concepts from earlier courses, as they are crucial for tackling more complex upper division problems. Many students find that they do not need to remember every detail from their introductory courses, as having access to old notes and textbooks can help bridge gaps in knowledge. Overall, upper division courses are described as more engaging and interesting, with a stronger focus on developing physical intuition.
TDRR
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Edit: I meant "first two year physics courses vs first two year math courses" in the title.

I know each school is different as far as how professors teach, but for those of you who are in your 3rd/4th year and beyond as a Physics major, how would you compare the material?

I'm not asking if Upper Division courses are more difficult, but do they resemble something more similar to Freshman E&M where it seemed like there was more math (Vector Calculus) than concepts, or more like Mechanics where it was a tad the opposite? Maybe something like the third course in Physics (Waves-Thermodynamics-Relativity-QM) where it was "balanced?"

Would you say you had to remember quite a lot of the concepts and peoblwm solving strategies you learned in your first 3 Physics courses? I'm starting to feel a little anxious and would greatly appreciate any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I just started my upper division physics classes last quarter and to be honest its pretty similar. Obviously however, you're required to have a better grasp of the math at these levels and be able to apply it in physical situation. I think (and this is all opinion so take it as you will) that mostly you're going to notice a larger emphasis on physical intuition and whether or not things make "physical sense". But it's do-able and much more interesting than lower division stuff if you ask me.
 


Thank you mateomy! One last question, how much did you have to remember from your original Greshman/Sophmore Physics courses or was it like relearning everything in a new way all over again?
 


Well, it all builds on itself. If you can't -for instance- remember how to solve simple problems using Guass' Law in E&M the upper division problems will seem a lot more complicated and confusing. But if you don't remember everything that's not a big deal so long as you have old notes and problems to reference. I'd doubt most people, save for the rare few, could remember EVERYTHING from their old classes. Just save your books and notes. They almost always prove valuable.
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
Hi community My aim is to get into research about atoms, specifically, I want to do experimental research that explores questions like: 1. Why do Gallium/Mercury have low melting points 2. Why are there so many exceptions and inconsistencies when it comes to explaining molecular structures / reaction mechanisms in inorganic and organic chemistry 3. Experimental research about fundamental Quantum Mechanics, such as the one being followed by Hiroshima university that proved that observing...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
Back
Top