Comparing Spectrometry Techniques: SAAF, ICP, SAAE, ICP-MS, LA-ICP-MS

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bibinou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comparison
AI Thread Summary
A user is seeking a comprehensive comparison of various spectrometry techniques, including SAAF, ICP, SAAE, ICP-MS, and LA-ICP-MS, focusing on analysis nature, concentration ranges, radiation types, and principles. Suggestions include consulting standard instrumental analysis texts and conducting online searches for relevant resources. The discussion highlights that no single website currently offers a complete comparison of all these technologies. Specific techniques are briefly defined, with links provided for further information on each method. The conversation emphasizes the need for accessible comparative data in the field of spectrometry.
Bibinou
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Do you know a website which has established a comparison between all spectrometry techniques like SAAF, ICP, SAAE, ICP-MS, LA-ICP-MS etc... concerning the nature of the analysis, the concentration domain, the nature of radiation and the main principle.

thank you very much
Bibinou
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try browsing through a standard instrumental analysis text, you can also google "spectroscopy" and probably find some relevant information.
 
I finally try to make a comparison by myself. None site on the internet compare all technologies.
 
ICP = Inductively Coupled Plasma

SAAF = Spectrométrie d'Absorption Atomique par Flamme (which is in French, of course) from http://hp.cresp.free.fr/projet/projets.htm (au france)

SAAE = Spectrométrie d'Absorption Atomique par Electrothermie (also French)

ICP-MS = Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometers
See - Varian's site - http://www.varianinc.com/cgi-bin/nav?products/spectr/icpms/index&cid=IQQNOHKMFL

http://www.spectroscopyonline.com/spectroscopy/data/articlestandard/spectroscopy/452001/1096/article.pdf

http://www.spectroscopymag.com/spec...Detail.jsp?sort=null&pageNo=3&start=18&id=229 Part 1 (PDF)

http://www.alschemex.com/learnmore/learnmore-techinfo-principles-analyticalmethodologies.htm

LA-ICPMS = Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwgeo/pages/labs/labs_LA_ICPMS.htm

http://www.geo.uu.nl/Research/Petrology/lab_facilities/laicpms.htm
http://www.geo.uu.nl/Research/Petrology/lab_facilities/what.htm


http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/mineralogie/links/tools/icp-ms.html - links to sites on spectroscopy and analytical methods.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very nice :)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top