Comparing two averages with different group sizes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohammad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Mohammad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have been recently intrigued by a seemingly simple problem: How to compare the averages of two groups with different sizes.

For example: Suppose you have a driver A who wins 100 out of 200 races, and a driver B who wins 1 out 2 races. It is clear that although the average is the same, driver A's achievement is less likely to occur (so it can be considered more valuable?).

I worked out a solution based on the Binomial distribution with the MLE for each driver as the parameter.

Pr(X = 100|1/2) = 0.0563 (N = 200)
Pr(X = 1|1/2) = 0.5 (N = 2)

The results matches my expectation as it indicates that the first event is less likely to occur. The problem however comes when I have a situation like this:

Driver A wins 65 out of 161 races.
Driver B wins 68 out of 244 races.

By evaluating the probabilities in the same way I got:

Pr(X = 65|65/161) = 0.0640
Pr(X = 68|68/244) = 0.0569

Intuitively, I reject this result because it is clear that driver A did a better job (because both drivers won almost the same number of races). I know it is probably because of the parameter I am using, but I don't know how to fix it.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://geography.uoregon.edu/GeogR/topics/ttest.htm Different group sizes are factored into the problem through the weighting of the variances across the two groups.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top