Comparison of solid and hollow cylinder

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of the strength of solid versus hollow cylinders, specifically in terms of their resistance to bending. Participants explore the implications of geometry, material properties, and loading conditions on the perceived strength of these two configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a solid cylinder is inherently stronger and harder to bend than a hollow cylinder.
  • Others argue that the strength comparison depends on the definition of "stronger" and the specific loading conditions.
  • One participant suggests that hollow cylinders may exhibit different buckling behavior, potentially affecting their strength under certain conditions.
  • Another participant highlights that the moment of inertia of a solid rod is greater than that of a hollow rod of the same outer diameter, which may allow the solid rod to withstand greater bending moments.
  • Some contributions mention that in specific scenarios, such as stress concentration or fatigue, hollow structures can be advantageous.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of considering the weight of the structures and how it influences their strength and application in mechanical contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether solid or hollow cylinders are stronger. Multiple competing views remain regarding the conditions under which each configuration might be considered stronger.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the comparison is limited to cylinders of the same outer diameter and material, and that the discussion does not account for specific loading conditions or applications that could influence the outcome.

physea
Messages
211
Reaction score
3
Hello!

We have a solid cylinder and then we take that and drill its core so that it becomes hollow.

In which case the cylinder will be stronger?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think? And in which way "stronger"?
 
Stronger meaning harder to bend.

I am not sure, I would assume the solid is stronger, but I need to prove it.
 
Why would it be stronger? It may be almost as strong as before, considering that during bending the strain in the median layer is minimal.

I think you are confused about the practice of using pipes instead of full rods in mechanical structures.
The idea is to take into account the weight of the pipe too. For the same weight per meter, a pipe may be stronger than a full rod. But the rod will have a much smaller diameter than the pipe, in this case.
 
I understand what you say. I agree that hollow pipes maybe stronger per weight or that thinner rods maybe as strong as hollow pipes. But I want to compare cylinders of the same outer diameter, one hollow and one not. And of the same material of course. And regardless of their weight/mass, yet the hollow cylinder of same outer diameter will of course have lower mass/weight.
 
Then I see no reason to expect that the hollow cylinder will be stronger. Maybe you can explain what makes you think it may behave this way.
 
Aha, the very last answer in that thread may have something, regarding the difference in "buckling" behavior.
 
I still cannot understand how the hollow will be stronger. That answer you pointed me, says that the solid rod would be slender. By slender I understand it will be thinner. But the question says that both the hollow and solid rod would have the SAME outer diameter, so what is he talking about?
 
  • #10
Any idea?
 
  • #11
Do the sums .
 
  • #12
Nidum said:
Do the sums .

which sums?
 
  • #13
Do you know how to work out the stresses and deflections for a loaded beam ?
 
  • #14
Not really, but I just want a yes or no answer for the beginning, then the why can follow

but I think stiffness is the youngs modulus times the second moment of area
 
Last edited:
  • #15
physea said:
I still cannot understand how the hollow will be stronger. That answer you pointed me, says that the solid rod would be slender. By slender I understand it will be thinner. But the question says that both the hollow and solid rod would have the SAME outer diameter, so what is he talking about?
I don't know what he is talking about. The solid rod has a greater moment of inertia than a hollow rod of the same outside diameter, and therefore can take greater bending moment than the hollow one. It also has a higher buckling load . Both max moment and critical buckling load are a function of I . Now it is assumed however that the weight of the rod in both cases is small in comparison to other applied loads.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum
  • #16
For a round bar of steel carrying simple static loads then it is certainly not true .

There are a few situations though where removing metal can make a component stronger .

This has to be looked at sometimes in problems where stress concentration , fatigue , crack propagation , dynamically induced stress or thermally induced stress determines the effective strength .

In these cases 'strength' usually has to be defined in terms of safe service life under a given loading rather than as simple brute strength .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K