Complete Works of Major Mathematicians (English)

AI Thread Summary
Many famous mathematicians, such as Cauchy, Lagrange, Euler, Gauss, and Riemann, have their original works published primarily in their native languages, making them difficult for English speakers to access. Despite the existence of comprehensive collections, like Cauchy's 27 volumes, English translations are scarce, leading to frustration among those interested in the original texts. The scientific content of these works is often summarized in later publications, reducing the incentive for broader readership. However, there is a belief that reading original works can provide significant mathematical insights, despite the challenges posed by the volume of material produced by these mathematicians. The discussion highlights the need for better access to English translations or resources for those eager to explore these foundational texts.
McSketch
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am very interested in reading the original works of some famous mathematicians, such as:

Cauchy
Lagrange
Euler
Gauss
The Bernoullis
Riemann
etc.

I have found the their respective works have been collected in volumes (for example, Cauchy has 27 volumes!) but they are all in their native language. I am an English only speaker :(.

I have tried (in vain) to find English translations of the complete works of these (and other) major mathematicians. If anyone has any idea of how I can find them, or if they even exist - I would greatly appreciate your input!

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try "God Created the Integers", a compilation with a foreword by Hawking.
 
McSketch said:
I am very interested in reading the original works of some famous mathematicians, such as:

Cauchy
Lagrange
Euler
Gauss
The Bernoullis
Riemann
etc.

I have found the their respective works have been collected in volumes (for example, Cauchy has 27 volumes!) but they are all in their native language. I am an English only speaker :(.

I have tried (in vain) to find English translations of the complete works of these (and other) major mathematicians. If anyone has any idea of how I can find them, or if they even exist - I would greatly appreciate your input!

Thanks!

It's not that many high-level, abstruse academic texts that are re-published in other languages than the original one. (Gauss, Bernoulli and Euler wrote much in Latin, and I think much of their work remain in that shape).

Reason:
The scientific content is (comparatively) swiftly squeezed out of it, and re-presented in other persons' work in their languages.
Thus, only a handful of dedicated historians of science find much reason to read the originals.
 
arildno said:
Reason:
The scientific content is (comparatively) swiftly squeezed out of it, and re-presented in other persons' work in their languages.
Thus, only a handful of dedicated historians of science find much reason to read the originals.

Still, I believe one could benefit mathematically from reading original works, something for which Mathwonk on this forum is a vocal proponent. So there might be much reason for the common mathematician to be interested in reading them, apart from historical interest.

Some of these mathematicians produced vast amounts of articles however. I think Euler have produced the most, but Riemann much less if I remember correctly what Mathwonk said some time ago.
 
Last edited:
@Dragonfall
Have it and have read it. It was such a tease! I need more! =)

@arildno
I do agree with you very much - but for example, I can't remember which Bernoulli did work on the catenary - but it is hard to find a very detailed analysis of hanging chains an so forth in modern texts - and I know he wrote much on this topic.

@Jarle
Yes, Euler wrote a vast amount (like 45 quarto volumes IIRC), Cauchy 27 volumes, and Riemann published very little but what he did publish was amazing =).

I suppose it's time to start learning French again ;(
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top