Completely filled conduction band

Karthikeyan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
From Pauli's principles, electrons cannot move into an already filled state. If i assume that somehow I fill in all the energy states in the conduction band (Population inversion :confused: )and then apply an electric field what happens??

Thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But look at the conduction BAND itself, which has a continuous empty states by definition. This means that it takes miniscule amount of energy for an electron to occupy an empty state from the filled state, and it does.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
But look at the conduction BAND itself, which has a continuous empty states by definition. This means that it takes miniscule amount of energy for an electron to occupy an empty state from the filled state, and it does.

Zz.
What about the number of states in the conduction band? Is this finite?? Is it like we can never fill all the energy states in the conduction band??
 
Last edited:
Karthikeyan said:
What about the number of states in the conduction band? Is this finite?? Is it like we can never fill all the energy states in the conduction band??

In principle, the total number of states is "infinite". But this isn't something unusual, because you can almost say the same thing about atomic states, since you set the principle quantum number to be "large" to get to the vacuum states. The same with the conduction band, except that it has a continuous states, rather than discrete.

Zz.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top