Complex Analysis => Fluid Flow

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in complex analysis related to fluid flow, specifically involving the complex velocity potential defined by an implicit equation. The original poster is attempting to understand how to express the complex velocity potential explicitly to analyze the fluid flow characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to find level curves of the streamfunction and express the complex velocity potential explicitly. Suggestions include exploring power series expansions and the relationship between the components of the complex function.

Discussion Status

There are various approaches being explored, including the use of power series and the identity function. Some participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of their suggestions, indicating a lack of consensus on a clear path forward.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of expressing the velocity potential and its implications for fluid flow, with some noting the challenge of deriving a closed form solution from the given implicit relationship.

cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
I'm struggling with this question right now:

Let the complex velocity potential [itex]\Omega(z)[/itex] be defined implicitly by

[tex]z = \Omega + e^{\Omega}[/tex]

Show that this map corresponds to (some kind of fluid flow, shown in a diagram, not important).

For background,

[tex]\Omega = \Phi + i\Psi[/tex]

where Phi is the velocity potential:

[tex]\mathbf{v} = \nabla\Phi[/tex]

and Psi is the harmonic conjugate of Phi (therefore it is the streamfunction of the fluid flow.

My first thought was that I need to find the level curves of the streamfunction in order to find out what kind of flow this is. But before I can do that, I need to solve for Omega explicitly. THAT's where I'm stumped. Any suggestions on a strategy or approach?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you can perhaps find a power series expansion for [itex]\Omega[/itex]. You have:

[tex]I = (I + \exp)\circ\Omega[/tex]

[tex](I + \exp)^{-1} = \Omega[/tex]

I think the best way to compute the left side is to look at the power series expansion of

[tex]\frac{1}{1 - x}[/tex]

where x is replaced with -exp. I can't think of a way to get a closed form solution out of this, but at least it will give you something to work with, hopefully enough to prove the other things you need to prove. Note given any thing like Z = X + iY, it's easy to express Y solely in terms if Z, and similarly X only in terms of Z

X = (Z + Z*)/2

Where Z* is the complex conjugate of Z.
 
Last edited:
AKG said:
Well, you can perhaps find a power series expansion for [itex]\Omega[/itex]. You have:

[tex]I = (I + \exp)\circ\Omega[/tex]

I'm really not sure what's going on here.
 
Sorry, I is the identity function. The left is I, so I(z) = z. The right is (I + exp)oQ, so

[(I + exp)oQ](z)
= (I + exp)(Q(z))
= I(Q(z)) + exp(Q(z))
= Q(z) + exp(Q(z))

I'm using Q for [itex]\Omega[/itex]. Anyways, I don't think the thing I suggested will work...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K