Complex Analysis: Using polar form to show arg(z1) - arg(z2) = 2n*pi

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the equation Re(z1z2*) = norm(z1) * norm(z2) implies θ1 - θ2 = 2nπ, where n is an integer, using polar forms of complex numbers. The key formulas include norm(z) = √(a² + b²) and z = r[cos(θ) + i*sin(θ)]. The proof involves expressing z1 and z2 in exponential form and demonstrating that cos(θ1 - θ2) = 1 leads to the conclusion that θ1 - θ2 = 2nπ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar forms of complex numbers
  • Knowledge of complex conjugates
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities
  • Basic proficiency in complex number operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex conjugates in polar form
  • Learn about the implications of the argument of a product of complex numbers
  • Explore the relationship between complex norms and angles
  • Investigate advanced topics in complex analysis, such as analytic functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying complex analysis, mathematicians interested in polar coordinates, and educators teaching advanced mathematics concepts.

I Love Math
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given that z[itex]_{1}[/itex]z[itex]_{2}[/itex] ≠ 0, use the polar form to prove that
Re(z[itex]_{1}[/itex][itex]\bar{z}[/itex][itex]_{2}[/itex]) = norm (z[itex]_{1}[/itex]) * norm (z[itex]_{2}[/itex]) [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex] θ[itex]_{1}[/itex] - θ[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 2n∏, where n is an integer, θ[itex]_{1}[/itex] = arg(z[itex]_{1}[/itex]), and θ[itex]_{2}[/itex] = arg(z[itex]_{2}[/itex]). Also, [itex]\bar{z}[/itex][itex]_{2}[/itex] is the conjugate of z[itex]_{2}[/itex].

Homework Equations



norm (z) = [itex]\sqrt{a^{2} + b^{2}}[/itex], where z = a +i*b.

norm (z) = r, where r is the radius.

z = r[cos θ + i*sin θ]

The Attempt at a Solution



Trying to prove the forward direction, I know the above formulas, and that arg(z[itex]_{1}[/itex]z[itex]_{2}[/itex]) = θ[itex]_{1}[/itex] + θ[itex]_{2}[/itex] +2n∏.
I'm having trouble getting the first step. I know that norm (z[itex]_{1}[/itex]) * norm (z[itex]_{2}[/itex]) = r[itex]_{1}[/itex]r[itex]_{2}[/itex], but I don't know if this is how you begin.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I Love Math said:

Homework Statement



Given that z[itex]_{1}[/itex]z[itex]_{2}[/itex] ≠ 0, use the polar form to prove that
Re(z[itex]_{1}[/itex][itex]\bar{z}[/itex][itex]_{2}[/itex]) = norm (z[itex]_{1}[/itex]) * norm (z[itex]_{2}[/itex]) [itex]\Leftrightarrow[/itex] θ[itex]_{1}[/itex] - θ[itex]_{2}[/itex] = 2n∏, where n is an integer, θ[itex]_{1}[/itex] = arg(z[itex]_{1}[/itex]), and θ[itex]_{2}[/itex] = arg(z[itex]_{2}[/itex]). Also, [itex]\bar{z}[/itex][itex]_{2}[/itex] is the conjugate of z[itex]_{2}[/itex].

Homework Equations



norm (z) = [itex]\sqrt{a^{2} + b^{2}}[/itex], where z = a +i*b.

norm (z) = r, where r is the radius.

z = r[cos θ + i*sin θ]

The Attempt at a Solution



Trying to prove the forward direction, I know the above formulas, and that arg(z[itex]_{1}[/itex]z[itex]_{2}[/itex]) = θ[itex]_{1}[/itex] + θ[itex]_{2}[/itex] +2n∏.
I'm having trouble getting the first step. I know that norm (z[itex]_{1}[/itex]) * norm (z[itex]_{2}[/itex]) = r[itex]_{1}[/itex]r[itex]_{2}[/itex], but I don't know if this is how you begin.

Thanks for any help!

remember

[tex]{z_1} = {r_1}{e^{{\theta _1}\pi i}},{z_2} = {r_2}{e^{{\theta _2}\pi i}},{{\bar z}_2} = {r_2}{e^{ - {\theta _2}\pi i}}[/tex]

then the first condition is

[tex]{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left( {{r_1}{r_2}{e^{i\pi ({\theta _1} - {\theta _2})}}} \right) = {r_1}{r_2}[/tex]

i.e.

[tex]\cos ({\theta _1} - {\theta _2}) = 1[/tex]

or [tex]{\theta _1} - {\theta _2} = 2n\pi[/tex]

You can make this more general if you like.

I'll let you take it from there.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K